Teams

HV GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-03vs RRTC BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesPolly Dickson / Morgen Calgaard vs Ellen Ribes-Smith / Tina Caranna1-6, 4-6
2021-05-13vs SSH GREENSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMorgen Calgaard vs Sydney Bridge2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesPiper Vitale vs Sam Erickson6-1, 7-6
2021-05-06vs SSLT REDLost 02
L#1 SinglesPiper Vitale vs Melissa Wiseman6-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesMorgen Calgaard vs Vanessa Parsons2-6, 2-6
2021-04-29vs HW TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesMorgen Calgaard / Piper Vitale vs Meredith van Wyk / Brittany Loui1-6, 4-6
2021-04-22vs CACI YELLOWWon 10
W#2 SinglesMorgen Calgaard vs Bernadette Rottschafer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Piper Vitale
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Morgen Calgaard
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Libby Palmer
published
2.68
Rhonda Williamson
published
2.66
Jeanne Cole
published
2.54
Carol Bryant
published 3
Polly Dickson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Morgen Calgaard + Libby Palmer102446% games+1.2% vs expected
Rhonda Williamson + Courtney Claussen1444% games−1.3% vs expected
Rhonda Williamson + Jeanne Cole1740% games−1.8% vs expected
Piper Vitale + Morgen Calgaard1441% gamesnot enough data
Rhonda Williamson + Carol Bryant224 matchesnot enough data
Piper Vitale + Courtney Claussen134 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Williamson + Piper Vitale123 matchesnot enough data
Polly Dickson + Jeanne Cole033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Piper Vitale
39W–52L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Morgen Calgaard
29W–53L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Libby Palmer
17W–36L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Courtney Claussen
4W–14L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rhonda Williamson
10W–57L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Jeanne Cole
9W–38L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Carol Bryant
31W–35L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
2.54
Polly Dickson
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.