Teams

Hardin-Delta

2024 Adult 40 & Over-DLT · Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-11vs Kimble-JXNWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeath Houston / Ricky Cousino vs Easy Biedenharn / Derek Howard6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Pinson vs Tim Mask7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesS Carlton Gorton / Mark Hardin vs Stephen Langley / Jeffrey Carmody6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-11vs Kimble-JXNWon 30
W#1 DoublesJeff Hardin / Alan Hargett vs Jason Griffin / Chris Register7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeath Houston vs Jeffrey Carmody7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChris Lee / Michael Pinson vs Stephen Langley / Mark Howard6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Kimble-JXNLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Stokes / Matthew Hicks vs Tim Mask / Kevin McKay3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRicky Cousino / Mark Hardin vs Jason Griffin / Chris Register6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Kimble-JXNWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeff Hardin / Alan Hargett vs Jeffrey Carmody / Jason Griffin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesS Carlton Gorton vs Chris Register6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Stokes / Matthew Hicks vs Tim Mask / Kevin McKay6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hardin-Delta229720164
2Kimble-JXN227920123

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Jeff Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alan Hargett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Heath Houston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.67
Michael Pinson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
S Carlton Gorton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mark Hardin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ricky Cousino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Stokes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Pinson + S Carlton Gorton044 matchesnot enough data
Michael Pinson + Robert Stokes224 matchesnot enough data
Alan Hargett + Jeff Hardin314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Pinson + Alan Hargett303 matchesnot enough data
Mark Hardin + Ricky Cousino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Hardin
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alan Hargett
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Heath Houston
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Pinson
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
S Carlton Gorton
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mark Hardin
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ricky Cousino
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Stokes
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.