Teams

LCRI-Richards/CSD

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-09vs LJCarruth-Patterson/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanet Marek / Karen Hallman vs Anna Gay / Jodi Patterson7-6, 6-4
2022-09-18vs LJCarruth-Patterson/CSDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hallman / Janet Baker vs Michelle Fontana / Kelly Kennard5-7, 1-6
2022-09-13vs LPATE-NMPLost 01
L#3 DoublesJamie Krueger / Karen Hallman vs Liz Barton / Stefanie Flippin0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Jennifer Gardiner
published
4.14
Irma Laney
published 4.5
4.10
Caroline Pickup
published 4
4.09
Kristina McKee
published
4.07
Christine Richards
published 4.5
3.97
Jamie Krueger
published 4
3.94
Laurie Cleveland
published
3.77
Karen Hallman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Janet Marek
published
3.71
Janet Baker
published
3.64
Cynthia Staton
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Gardiner + Caroline Pickup314 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Cleveland + Jamie Krueger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Gardiner
38W–32L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Irma Laney
42W–20L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4
Caroline Pickup
247W–114L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
4.10
Kristina McKee
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Christine Richards
22W–19L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4
Jamie Krueger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
Laurie Cleveland
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Karen Hallman
106W–82L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Janet Marek
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.74
Janet Baker
37W–32L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Cynthia Staton
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.