Teams

RTC NUNEZ

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-14vs RTC LOVESplit 22
L#1 DoublesSam Nunez / Steven McArthur vs Landon Love / Brian Ownby1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Zamora / Joey Heft vs Rick Meisel / Matt Chehab1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesChris Pineda vs Sean McPherson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmmon Lutz / Sterling Gray vs Chris Zafiriou / Justin Markle6-0, 6-0
2025-04-26vs CCC LEONARDWon 50
W#1 DoublesSam Nunez / Joey Heft vs Judson Sheppard / Christopher Musgrove6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAmmon Lutz vs Ryan Seaver6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Carney / Chris Pineda vs Joshua Leonard / David Nolan6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesSantiago Zarzosa vs Cory Boggess6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrad Terry / Ernest Resma vs Alexander Owre / Eric Spurgeon6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-29vs RTC JOINERWon 40
W#1 DoublesSam Nunez / Chris Pineda vs Michael Rea / Jay Smith2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Zamora / Ammon Lutz vs Curt Hansen / Barry Christensen6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJoey Heft vs Tim Hawkins6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSantiago Zarzosa / Ernest Resma vs Wilson Leung / John Nguyen6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Steven McArthur
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.38
Sterling Gray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Chris Pineda
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Kyle Carney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.25
Santiago Zarzosa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ammon Lutz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Ernest Resma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Daniel Zamora
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Joey Heft
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sam Nunez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Nunez + Steven McArthur4355% games−0.5% vs expected
Daniel Zamora + Ammon Lutz314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven McArthur
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.44
Sterling Gray
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Chris Pineda
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Kyle Carney
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Santiago Zarzosa
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ammon Lutz
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ernest Resma
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Daniel Zamora
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Joey Heft
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Sam Nunez
9W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.