Teams

Upton EC 3.0W

2025 Team Singles Tournament-NE · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-02vs Gammill NE 3.0WWon 21
L#1 SinglesHillary Richardson vs Kelly Young0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLeah Howard vs Elise Mcmasters7-5, 7-6
W#3 SinglesPatti Stanley vs Lacey Harden7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Beck NE 3.0WWon 21
W#1 SinglesPatti Stanley vs Alli Maloney6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHillary Richardson vs Savannah Koon6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesCathryn Borer vs Ashley Gilliland6-7, 4-6
2025-03-01vs Swafford DEL 3.0WWon 21
W#1 SinglesLeah Howard vs Katherine Swafford6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesShelby Brown vs Ashley Cox6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesMcKenzie Thatcher vs Teresa Reed6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2025-02-28vs Cotton DEL 3.0WLost 12
L#1 SinglesMcKenzie Thatcher vs Michie Cotton4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesShelby Brown vs Amanda Snell6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesCathryn Borer vs Brooke Tims2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Patti Stanley
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.77
Cathryn Borer
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Hillary Richardson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Leah Howard
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
McKenzie Thatcher
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Shelby Brown
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelby Brown + McKenzie Thatcher404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patti Stanley
25W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Cathryn Borer
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Hillary Richardson
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Howard
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
McKenzie Thatcher
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelby Brown
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.