Teams

San Angelo-Angelo Aces

2025 18 & Over Little State · Ladies 4.0 Flight

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-16vs Corpus-Hit It & Quit ItLost 23
L#1 DoublesChasity Ross / Hallye Phillips vs Theresa Swirenko / Debbie Aldrighetti2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJessica Theimer vs Lisa Garcia6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJulia Lane / Tibby Niehues vs Hazel Manjarris / Nancy Barrera4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKymberli Harper vs Mary Lupe Arana6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJessie Hoak / Christi Belmont vs Rebecca Pina / Janet Knesek1-6, 2-6
2025-08-15vs NOHO-Break PointLost 14
W#1 DoublesKymberli Harper / Jessie Hoak vs Rachel Wilson / Elizabeth von Bodungen7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMiranda Stewart vs Elizabeth Curry2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTibby Niehues / Christi Belmont vs Suya Rossouw / Eleonora Tonti7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJessica Theimer vs Leah Koester1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLexanne Edmiston / Chasity Ross vs PAIGE PHUONG / My Phuong2-6, 0-6
2025-08-15vs Valley-MCCLost 23
W#1 DoublesKymberli Harper / Miranda Stewart vs Maria-Camila Gonzalez / Paulina Gonzalez7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHallye Phillips vs Zaira Martinez-Guillen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTibby Niehues / Julia Lane vs Barbara Duda / Elica MacHin2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChristi Belmont vs Rachel Torres4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLexanne Edmiston / Jessie Hoak vs Sylvia Pompa / Ivonne Tovar3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 4.0 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kymberli Harper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.78
Kim Westbrook
published
3.73
Jessica Theimer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.66
Chasity Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Christi Belmont
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Miranda Stewart
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Lexanne Edmiston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Jessie Hoak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Julia Lane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Christy Ross
published 3.5
3.23
Hallye Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Tibby Niehues
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessie Hoak + Lexanne Edmiston5550% games+7.6% vs expected
Jessica Theimer + Miranda Stewart7065% games+6.2% vs expected
Jessica Theimer + Jessie Hoak5255% games−2.4% vs expected
Chasity Ross + Christy Ross51045% games−5.9% vs expected
Kim Westbrook + Lexanne Edmiston9161% gamesnot enough data
Kymberli Harper + Lexanne Edmiston6159% gamesnot enough data
Christy Ross + Kim Westbrook3352% gamesnot enough data
Tibby Niehues + Julia Lane3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kymberli Harper
37W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.94
Kim Westbrook
58W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.78
Jessica Theimer
65W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Chasity Ross
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Christi Belmont
56W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Miranda Stewart
60W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Lexanne Edmiston
57W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Jessie Hoak
72W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.52
Julia Lane
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Christy Ross
70W–107L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Hallye Phillips
43W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Tibby Niehues
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.