Teams

BSF:Nguyen

2023 NCT Adult 18 & Over Men · 4.5 Adult Men 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesAndrew Coleman / Ted Krawiec vs Brian Untch / Brendan Kolnick4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLiem Nguyen / Rohan Brown vs Stephen Dunn / Zachary Shemms3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRandy Giarnella / Scott Paul vs Craig Puffenberger / David Taylor6-4, 4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesRohan Brown / Scott Paul vs Kyle Hine / Shawn Stillman2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBing Shue vs Johnathan Dangerfield1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Men 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Rob Borea
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.85
Raul Valdes
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.81
Liem Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Daksh Rampal
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.69
Rohan Brown
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.64
Bing Shue
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.63
David Goodwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Andrew Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Randy Giarnella
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Ted Krawiec
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Scott Paul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Goodwin + Raul Valdes8456% games+6.0% vs expected
Rohan Brown + Liem Nguyen7652% games+3.5% vs expected
Andrew Coleman + Raul Valdes3448% games+3.3% vs expected
Raul Valdes + Rob Borea4356% games+2.8% vs expected
David Goodwin + Liem Nguyen6354% games+1.6% vs expected
Liem Nguyen + Raul Valdes4355% games+1.3% vs expected
Randy Giarnella + David Goodwin7156% games−4.3% vs expected
Randy Giarnella + Ted Krawiec3739% games−4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rob Borea
56W–35L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%88%12%
4.33
Raul Valdes
104W–70L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Liem Nguyen
119W–114L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Daksh Rampal
30W–43L career · type A · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rohan Brown
86W–95L career · 9 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Bing Shue
43W–46L career · 11 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
David Goodwin
73W–60L career · 1 line in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Andrew Coleman
37W–111L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Randy Giarnella
62W–126L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Ted Krawiec
58W–90L career · 6 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Scott Paul
31W–54L career · 8 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.