Teams

Five Seasons Ohio

2023 OH OV SPRING A40&O Cincinnati · 2023 Spring Daytime 40&0 3.5W Cincinnati

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-25vs Queen CityLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarisela Amaya / Farrah Hatfield vs Traci Butrum / Jaime Hinkle2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Kahn vs Tricia Danziger1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Lambrinides / Ruth Blum vs Laura Zajac / Teresa Benning1-6, 4-6
2023-07-13vs CamargoLost 13
W#1 DoublesMarisela Amaya / Debra Filbrandt vs Danielle Abdo / Kerry Foley7-6, 2-1
L#1 SinglesTerri Barbush vs Stacy Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Buttram / Robin Balmer vs Allison Parlin / Lauren Grote3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Lambrinides / Barbara Lee vs Mandy Longbottom / Stacy Williams0-6, 6-7
2023-06-22vs Queen CityLost 13
L#1 DoublesMargaret Buttram / Robin Balmer vs Tracey DiFalco / Victoria Amongero6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVictoria Kahn vs Nicole Barkley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFarrah Hatfield / Barbara Lee vs Tricia Danziger / Becky Ishee2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRuth Blum / Diane Lambrinides vs Michelle Langhammer / Teresa Benning6-4, 5-1
2023-06-15vs CamargoLost 13
L#1 DoublesDebra Filbrandt / Robin Balmer vs Anna Topalidis / Susan Tracy3-6, 6-4, 1-2
L#1 SinglesTerri Barbush vs Stacy Wilson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPamela Moore Carney / Lynn Sovec vs Lindsay Cassady / Kerry Foley6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Lambrinides / Victoria Kahn vs Betsy Leonidas / Mandy Longbottom4-6, 3-6
2023-06-01vs Queen CityLost 12
L#1 DoublesVictoria Kahn / Debra Filbrandt vs Christine Douglas / Megan Blake2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMarisela Amaya vs Nicole Barkley6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMargaret Buttram / Ruth Blum vs Michelle Langhammer / Meg Argo4-6, 6-5, 0-1
2023-05-25vs CamargoLost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela Moore Carney / Farrah Hatfield vs Lauren Grote / Hiromi Kashiwakura5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarisela Amaya vs Stacy Wilson6-4, 2-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynn Sovec / Debra Filbrandt vs Mandy Longbottom / Kerry Foley6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTerri Barbush / Barbara Lee vs Susan Tracy / Anna Topalidis2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 Spring Daytime 40&0 3.5W Cincinnati
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Camargo6019514184
2Five Seasons Ohio1571735233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Lynn Sovec
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Pamela Moore Carney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Barbara Raffaelli
published 3.5
Farrah Hatfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Ruth Blum
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Margaret Buttram
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Diane Lambrinides
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Debra Filbrandt
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Katy Habegger
published
Marisela Amaya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Robin Balmer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Terri Barbush
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Victoria Kahn
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Lambrinides + Ruth Blum6553% gamesnot enough data
Diane Lambrinides + Pamela Moore Carney123 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Moore Carney + Lynn Sovec303 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Moore Carney + Ruth Blum303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Sovec
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
3.44
Pamela Moore Carney
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Barbara Raffaelli
11W–17L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Farrah Hatfield
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Blum
80W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Margaret Buttram
54W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Diane Lambrinides
23W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.61
Debra Filbrandt
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katy Habegger
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marisela Amaya
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Balmer
71W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Barbush
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Kahn
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.