Teams

Wilbert/18/6.5/M/BREC

2026 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 6.5 BR (18&O) Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.14 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 10 6:30 PM
Southern Oaks Athletic Club
Sep 17 6:30 PM
BREC Forest Park Tennis Center
Sep 24 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Lyndon Wilbert
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Independence Park Tennis Center
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Independence Park Tennis Center
2026-08-27vs Mannino/18/6.5/CM/UCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLyndon Wilbert / Beau Comeaux vs Chandler Courreges / Matt Hunt6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDaniel Lockwood / Joseph Mengis vs Kenneth Aldridge / Cleve Brown4-6, 4-6
2026-08-13vs Ourso/18/6.5/CM/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Hershey / Tyler Wilson vs Ryan Kinsley / Aaron Halstead4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesConnor Barney / Christopher Brewer vs Alexander Do / Mark Ourso0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChristian Hyde / Beau Comeaux vs Zach Ingram / Nick Toben5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-08-06vs Ligh/18/6.5/CM/BRECLost 12
L#1 DoublesLyndon Wilbert / Stewart Gordon vs Tyler Busby / Antoine Davis7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Lockwood / Beau Comeaux vs Alexander Meinberg / Chad Landry6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristian Hyde / Christopher Brewer vs Aaron Harberson / Chandra Kandula3-6, 0-6
2026-07-30vs Mueller/18/6.5/CM/SOACLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaden Eisen / Christian Hyde vs Nicholas Mueller / Karsten Thompson1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDaniel Lockwood / Stewart Gordon vs Dylan Hart / Cameron Hart6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBeau Comeaux / Connor Barney vs Michael Vincent / Keaton Teas6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 BR (18&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ourso/18/6.5/CM/BREC2051443
2Mueller/18/6.5/CM/SOAC2042555
3Ligh/18/6.5/CM/BREC21541184
4Mannino/18/6.5/CM/UC0224962
5Wilbert/18/6.5/M/BREC032715102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Benjamin Hershey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Lyndon Wilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Daniel Lockwood
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Christian Hyde
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Connor Barney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.83
Stewart Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Joseph Mengis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Christopher Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Beau Comeaux
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.17
Caden Eisen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christian Hyde + Connor Barney044 matchesnot enough data
Beau Comeaux + Joseph Mengis303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Benjamin Hershey
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
Lyndon Wilbert
32W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Daniel Lockwood
16W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Christian Hyde
1W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Connor Barney
1W–24L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.02
Stewart Gordon
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Joseph Mengis
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
3
Christopher Brewer
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Beau Comeaux
18W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
2.5
Caden Eisen
6W–10L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.