Teams

GSTL18/Berry/GrandeDunes

2024 Combo 18 & Over-GSTL · Adult Women - 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.81 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-28vs GSTL18/Singleton/PrestwickLost 01
L#2 DoublesConstance Brophy / Diana Morgan vs Allison DeVaux / Kerry Schwanz1-6, 5-7
2024-09-11vs GSTL18/Whiteside/StablesLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy McAlpine / Diana Morgan vs Erica Umpierrez / Stella Mercado2-6, 2-6
2024-07-31vs GSTL18/Paudel/DunesLost 01
L#3 DoublesDiana Morgan / Sandy McAlpine vs Sarah Bonnoitt / Myla Butler5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anna Berry
published 4
Catherine Hill
published 4
3.52
Denise Watts
published 4
3.44
Deborah Dempsey
published 3.5
3.30
Constance Brophy
published 4
3.28
Karen Swartling
published
3.20
Sandy McAlpine
published
3.06
Diana Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Debbie Michnowicz
published 3.5
2.81
Kalina Petrova
published
2.68
Staci Bellamy
published
Jan Berry
published
Janet Mathews
published
Kelle Siegmund
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanne Johnson Stephens + Karen Swartling303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Berry
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Catherine Hill
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Denise Watts
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Deborah Dempsey
24W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.44
4
Deanne Johnson Stephens
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
3.42
4
Constance Brophy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.30
Karen Swartling
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Sandy McAlpine
2W–24L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.20
3.5
Diana Morgan
53W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Debbie Michnowicz
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.96
Kalina Petrova
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.81
Staci Bellamy
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
Jan Berry
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Mathews
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelle Siegmund
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.