← Teams

LOTC-Lavios/Hesslink

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Steve Swan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.49
Danny Denning
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.45
Kevin Semonsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Michael Lavios
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
John Wallin
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Ken Dragoon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Ryan Owens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Robert Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Paul Preston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Robert Hesslink
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Paul Kachel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Joe Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Steve Swan
28W–51L career
0%40%60%
3.66
4
Danny Denning
64W–77L career
36%64%0%
3.49
3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%88%12%
3.45
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.34
3.5
John Wallin
66W–61L career
5%91%5%
3.28
3.5
Ken Dragoon
67W–93L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
5%95%0%
3.15
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
12%88%0%
3.09
3
Paul Preston
31W–41L career
0%75%24%
3.00
3
Robert Hesslink
70W–52L career
1%98%1%
2.79
3
Paul Kachel
19W–29L career
7%87%6%
2.77
3
Joe Gallagher
9W–10L career · type A
2%97%1%
2.75

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.