Teams

Rivertown - Caballero

2025 Duval Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 2.62 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-07vs The Yards - SheehanLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Padgett / Paul Yeoman vs Colleen Sheehan / Dan Sheehan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Cline / Brad van Gelder vs Shannon Tofflemire / John Baldwin4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Bernard / Joe Cline vs Cindy Shepard / John Shepard5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-31vs ABCC - KeleherWon 21
W#1 DoublesNikki Warner / Julio Caballero vs Emily Miller / Rob Miller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristina Barnes / John Barnes vs Kate Service / Matt Eaton6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDeborah Bouchard / Emilio Martinez vs Christine Levy / Michael Flanagan4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Paul Yeoman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Rachelle Stewart
published
2.90
Colette Lennox
published 2.5
2.79
Julio Caballero
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Nikki Warner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brad van Gelder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Linda Cline
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Rebecca Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Sheila Caballero
published
2.51
Jacqueline Bernard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Deborah Bouchard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Anthony Lennox
published 2.5
Emilio Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Cline
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristina Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Otis Duncan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachelle Stewart + Anthony Lennox3253% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Caballero + Paul Yeoman404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Yeoman
35W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Rachelle Stewart
43W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.92
2.5
Colette Lennox
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.90
Julio Caballero
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Nikki Warner
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Brad van Gelder
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linda Cline
10W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%12%88%
2.67
Rebecca Padgett
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%25%75%
2.59
Sheila Caballero
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Jacqueline Bernard
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Deborah Bouchard
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Anthony Lennox
3W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Emilio Martinez
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Joe Cline
5W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristina Barnes
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Otis Duncan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.