Teams

Virden/LR/Reb

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.60 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs Adkins/LR/PVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnne Virden vs Stefan Jones0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesHayley Hackett vs Evans Lee3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesAnna Griffiths vs Jessica Doose0-6, 2-6
2024-12-11vs Miller/LR/BPSplit 11
W#2 SinglesHayley Hackett vs Madolyn Miller6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesConstance Lovelace vs Martina Davis3-6, 2-6
2024-11-21vs Crowder/NLR/LakewoodLost 03
L#1 SinglesConstance Lovelace vs Briana Crowder1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Griffiths vs Leah Welker0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHayley Hackett vs Regina Maher0-6, 0-6
2024-11-13vs Bledsoe/LR/PVCCLost 03
L#1 SinglesAnne Virden vs Amanda Bledsoe1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Griffiths vs Annie Hogate4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesPaige Shields vs Avery Jennings1-6, 1-6
2024-11-07vs Anthony/LR/CCLRLost 03
L#1 SinglesConstance Lovelace vs Allison Anthony0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAnne Virden vs Rachel Sims4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesBrandilyn Morris vs Erin Baskin3-6, 1-6
2024-11-05vs Rutledge/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 SinglesPaige Shields vs Eliza Meredith6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnna Griffiths vs Sarah Gold6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.51
Hayley Hackett
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.42
Brandilyn Morris
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Anna Griffiths
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.13
Constance Lovelace
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
1.96
Anne Virden
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Paige Shields
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Sara Bryant
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hayley Hackett
25W–34L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Brandilyn Morris
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Anna Griffiths
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Constance Lovelace
8W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Anne Virden
3W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Paige Shields
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Bryant
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.