Teams

Roland/Knoxville

2026 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 5.5 Women Combo Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 20 2:45 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Sep 27 2:45 PM
West Hills Tennis Center
Oct 4 2:45 PM
Tyson Family Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs Pirates /KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecca Decker / Jennifer Mendoza vs Elizabeth Justus / Carrie Wegryn2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Cutter / Rebecca Allen vs Anna Kizer / Erika Morris6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Olesiuk / Ketki Sheth vs Lindsey Gallaher / Jennifer Cada6-1, 6-0
2026-08-26vs RoseRhody/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaula Cutter / Anna Taylor vs Annabel Sims / Keri Brill6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBecca Decker / Cheri Arnsdorff vs Angela Rae Rhody / Hannah Frame6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.5 Women Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Roland/Knoxville000000
2Open/Knoxville000000
3RoseRhody/Knoxville000000
4Pirates /Knoxville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Anessa Savici
published 3
2.88
Sarah Olesiuk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Courtney Dyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Elsa Roland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Paula Cutter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.51
Jennifer Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Renee Bagwell
published
2.39
Cheri Arnsdorff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Ketki Sheth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheri Arnsdorff + Jennifer Mendoza8271% games+16.2% vs expected
Cheri Arnsdorff + Paula Cutter5071% games+15.5% vs expected
Cheri Arnsdorff + Ketki Sheth4155% gamesnot enough data
Renee Bagwell + Elsa Roland404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anessa Savici
26W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Sarah Olesiuk
28W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Courtney Dyer
22W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Elsa Roland
47W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%5%95%
2.73
Paula Cutter
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.65
Jennifer Mendoza
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
0%48%52%
2.51
Renee Bagwell
15W–19L career · no lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Cheri Arnsdorff
31W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Ketki Sheth
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.