Teams

NPratt (Blakeney)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-11vs AKupchella/AJeter (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaurey Cosentino / Helen Wood vs Ashley Kreth / Caroline Chambers6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Guerra / Nancy Pratt vs Lee Kirksey / Amy Snead6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCelia Bolzani / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Amanda Kupchella / Callie Lloyd6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-09-04vs IMcLeod (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShanin Trivanovic / Payal K vs Isabelle Mcleod / Caitlin Morganthall4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Guerra / Nancy Pratt vs Lauren Burke / Landis Fuller4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLena Patel / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Jessie Zande / Jordan Reardon3-6, 3-6
2026-08-21vs KHudson (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLaurey Cosentino / Erin Colonna vs Kathy Harborne / Hannah Lambert1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPayal K / Helen Wood vs Anna Medica / Alexandra Pavleszek2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlpana Patel / Nancy Pratt vs Keely Hudson / Ursula Bonar2-6, 0-6
2026-08-14vs SLauer (Brookhaven)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlpana Patel / Payal K vs Kimberly Stafford / Shawna Lauer3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesErin Colonna / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Laura Hunter / Jennifer Anthony6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCelia Bolzani / Diane DeMus vs Kaylyn Patterson / Jennifer Armeny5-7, 4-6
2026-08-07vs CSoliday (Jeff Adams)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCelia Bolzani / Laurey Cosentino vs Sarah Dobson / Kim Benton1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLena Patel / Diane DeMus vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Shanin Trivanovic
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Monica Guerra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Helen Wood
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Celia Bolzani
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Lena Patel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Laurey Cosentino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Patti Glassburner
published
2.39
Erin Colonna
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.36
Alpana Patel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Kashmira Wankhedkar
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.23
Nancy Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.14
Payal K
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.09
Diane DeMus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Anne Talmage
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane DeMus + Anne Talmage044 matchesnot enough data
Shanin Trivanovic + Monica Guerra314 matchesnot enough data
Laurey Cosentino + Anne Talmage044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Shanin Trivanovic
55W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Monica Guerra
56W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Helen Wood
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Celia Bolzani
7W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
Lena Patel
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Laurey Cosentino
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Patti Glassburner
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.42
3
Erin Colonna
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.39
3
Alpana Patel
0W–18L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
85%15%<1%
2.36
Kashmira Wankhedkar
16W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.34
Nancy Pratt
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.23
Payal K
8W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14
2.5
Diane DeMus
17W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
2.5
Anne Talmage
4W–20L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.