Teams

DTC GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-30vs NJ REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Rebecca Wulliman vs Cynthia Snavely / Linda Prior5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Glazer / Nancy Alterman vs Ana Bland / Nancy Stapp6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Deborah Yoder vs Eve Wall / Elizabeth Shields7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-23vs EPR REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Bookmyer / Nancy Alterman vs Lisa Pomerantz / Terri Jenney6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Yoder / Susan Nakano vs Teri Harrington / Tia Heneghan6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Rebecca Wulliman vs Sheryl Flater / Lynne McHugh5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-16vs LTC-D NAVYLost 12
W#1 DoublesWendy Glazer / Nancy Alterman vs Tammy Roth / Janet Marks4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Allison Bookmyer vs Nancy Driver / Linda Sexton3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Julie Underdahl vs Lauren Gardiner / Vera Aaron6-7, 0-6
2025-07-09vs NJ REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Saiber Ehrlich / Allison Bookmyer vs Ana Bland / Becky Myers6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHelene Grall-Johnson / Jody Hunnicutt vs Helen Hock / Linda Prior6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Nakano / Linda Feiman vs Mary Bare / Elizabeth Shields6-3, 6-0
2025-07-02vs EPR REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJody Hunnicutt / Helene Grall-Johnson vs Lisa Pomerantz / Kathi Harr6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Julie Underdahl vs Karen Noreyko / Liz Hafer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Graveley / Linda Feiman vs Sheryl Flater / Tia Heneghan6-1, 6-1
2025-06-25vs LTC-D NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Saiber Ehrlich / Allison Bookmyer vs Linda Sexton / Martha McNamara6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Andrews / Rebecca Wulliman vs Janet Marks / Nancy Driver6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Feiman / Susan Nakano vs Lauren Gardiner / Vera Aaron6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Jody Hunnicutt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Allison Bookmyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca Wulliman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Wendy Glazer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Julie Underdahl
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.13
Laura Saiber Ehrlich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Nancy Alterman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Linda Feiman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Susan Nakano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Helene Grall-Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Deborah Yoder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Kathy Graveley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathleen Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Feiman + Jody Hunnicutt10358% games+7.1% vs expected
Linda Feiman + Susan Nakano19758% games+5.0% vs expected
Deborah Yoder + Julie Underdahl4353% games+1.1% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Deborah Yoder3250% games+0.4% vs expected
Wendy Glazer + Nancy Alterman111047% games−1.7% vs expected
Jody Hunnicutt + Julie Underdahl6552% games−2.6% vs expected
Susan Nakano + Jody Hunnicutt3447% games−4.0% vs expected
Deborah Yoder + Helene Grall-Johnson2638% games−14.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jody Hunnicutt
109W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Allison Bookmyer
20W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Wulliman
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Wendy Glazer
79W–93L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3
Julie Underdahl
53W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.17
3.5
Laura Saiber Ehrlich
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Nancy Alterman
30W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Linda Feiman
55W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Susan Nakano
57W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.00
3.5
Helene Grall-Johnson
31W–83L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Deborah Yoder
37W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Kathy Graveley
38W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathleen Andrews
39W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.