Teams

SD 3.0WE Balboa TC/ La Crue

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SD WE · SD - Women - 3.0 WE

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-16vs SD 3.0WE SDTRC/ KleinerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMonica La Crue / Marisa Alvarado vs Marva Gesell / Maren Outwater6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMonica La Crue / Jill McAllaster vs Candace Gyure / Dianne Golingan6-2, 6-1
2025-02-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesJill McAllaster vs Wendy Collins5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-17vs SD 3.0WE SDTRC/ KleinerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarisa Alvarado / Monica La Crue vs Lisa Bolelli / Melinda Meader7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMonica La Crue vs Meg Hagan4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesMonica La Crue / Marisa Alvarado vs Susan Gammon / Candace Gyure6-1, 6-4
2025-02-02vs SD 3.0WE SDTRC/ KleinerWon 10
W#1 SinglesJill McAllaster vs Marina Tomczak6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesJill McAllaster / Julie McCarthy vs Janet Bergland / Victoria Lugash2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMarisa Alvarado vs Felicia Danielle Oliva7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJill McAllaster vs Amy Rorstad6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Monica La Crue
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Marisa Alvarado
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.86
Jill McAllaster
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Carrie Bolger
published 3
Celine Galliano
published 3
2.64
Peggy Bentley
published
Julie McCarthy
published
Kelly Covello
published
Lynn Muradian
published
Suzanne Rogers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisa Alvarado + Monica La Crue12459% games+7.2% vs expected
Marisa Alvarado + Jill McAllaster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Monica La Crue
57W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Marisa Alvarado
49W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Jill McAllaster
27W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Carrie Bolger
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Celine Galliano
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peggy Bentley
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Julie McCarthy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Covello
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Muradian
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Rogers
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.