Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.5 W GML Nicolet Mohrbacker

2022 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Mccarthy / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Lynn Becker / Michelle Godden6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesErin Mohrbacker vs Kathleen Oldenburg6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTara Ali / Natalie Hendrix vs Meike Mansfield / Arleen More O'Ferrall2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesBrigitte Potter vs Heather Nill6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDebra George / Tanya Kotar vs Linda Match / Carrie Buri0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesBethany Girardi / Kristi Luzar vs Karen Straw / Dagmar Vetta6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Mohrbacker vs Melissa Lee-Sundlov6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Brigitte Potter vs Robin Devilbiss / Susan Kortas6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKatie Schultz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMarjorie Mccarthy / Tanya Kotar vs Lynn Eschenburg / Julie Reigle4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesBethany Girardi / Cara Buchanan vs Margie Mesker-Grimm / Jill Gardetto4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Schultz vs Amber Balistreri-Ottson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTara Ali / Natalie Hendrix vs Beth Hlava / Kathryn Tweet7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTanya Kotar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Casey / Debra George vs Emily Levene / Kelly Thompson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBethany Girardi / Brigitte Potter vs Olga Konrath / Barb Seidl6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Mohrbacker vs Nikki Packee6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTara Ali / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Alisa Lambo / Taylor Seidl6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKristi Luzar vs Linda Moses0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCara Buchanan / Natalie Hendrix vs Dawn Graham / Sandra Olson6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesErin Mohrbacker / Gabrielle Hendrix vs Heidi Rozman / Kristin Hieb6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Schultz vs Cat Long6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrigitte Potter / Marjorie Mccarthy vs Amy Marshall / Kelly Hofbauer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoyce Casey / Natalie Hendrix vs Cherise Edwards / Alexandra Doyle7-6, 6-3
L#1 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Marjorie Mccarthy vs Theresa Seem / Jane Stephens6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBethany Girardi vs Susan Loomis6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebra George / Kristi Luzar vs Heather Theder / Melissa Nelsen2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCara Buchanan vs Laura Vuchetich6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTanya Kotar / Natalie Hendrix vs Rena Weller / Maria Fenske2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesTara Ali / Cara Buchanan vs Chandana Tamma / Michelle Godden2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErin Mohrbacker vs Kamal Irani6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMarjorie Mccarthy / Kristi Luzar vs Linda Match / Karen Stromsted2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKatie Schultz vs Kathleen Oldenburg6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebra George / Joyce Casey vs Arleen More O'Ferrall / Margaret Feind5-7, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKatie Schultz / Tara Ali vs Dagmar Vetta / Karen Straw6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesErin Mohrbacker vs Melissa Mann2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGabrielle Hendrix / Natalie Hendrix vs Robin Devilbiss / Susan Kortas6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBrigitte Potter vs Angie Caskey7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoyce Casey / Marjorie Mccarthy vs Tiffany Reilly / Sue Connor6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.5 (Eve) Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Erin Mohrbacker
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.42
Katie Schultz
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.39
Brigitte Potter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Cara Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.16
Bethany Girardi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Gabrielle Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 3.5
3.09
Tara Ali
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Debra George
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Natalie Hendrix
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
2.94
Marjorie Mccarthy
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Joyce Casey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Tanya Kotar
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.61
Kristi Luzar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brigitte Potter + Gabrielle Hendrix19658% games+4.8% vs expected
Debra George + Natalie Hendrix5454% games+3.9% vs expected
Natalie Hendrix + Gabrielle Hendrix251456% games+2.4% vs expected
Natalie Hendrix + Tara Ali4354% games+1.3% vs expected
Marjorie Mccarthy + Tara Ali5348% games−2.2% vs expected
Tanya Kotar + Gabrielle Hendrix1543% games−3.0% vs expected
Bethany Girardi + Gabrielle Hendrix10253% games−3.6% vs expected
Debra George + Tanya Kotar11749% games−4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Mohrbacker
96W–113L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Katie Schultz
41W–30L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Brigitte Potter
53W–27L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Cara Buchanan
41W–32L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Bethany Girardi
41W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gabrielle Hendrix
84W–53L career · 14 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Tara Ali
34W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Debra George
28W–31L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Natalie Hendrix
72W–52L career · 13 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
3.5
Marjorie Mccarthy
13W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
2.94
3
Joyce Casey
62W–113L career · 10 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Tanya Kotar
63W–71L career · 9 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Kristi Luzar
20W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.