Teams

Harloff/Tangeman

2025 Alachua Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesCarla Intal / Alexander Johnson vs Lisa Booth / Jorge Torres-Vazquez2-6, 6-4
2025-03-04vs JTC LancasterWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarla Intal / Alexander Johnson vs Julie Skoby / Yoonsuk Park6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIdalhi Barnes-marrero / Robert Tangeman vs Ed Stark / Xue Li6-2, 7-5
2025-02-28vs JTC LancasterWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Intal / Alexander Johnson vs Gregg Fissenden / Margaret Zerbe6-3, 6-2
2025-02-23vs HCC HawkstoneLost 01
L#3 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Stephanie Tangeman vs Chiara de Gennaro / Tom Lowery2-6, 0-6
2025-02-11vs Alachua/Wesson/40&Over6.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Harloff / Wanda Cross vs Paul Wesson / Mary Butterworth4-6, 5-7
2025-02-03vs WS JewellsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Idalhi Barnes-marrero vs Colin Smith / Katherine Ratliff3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCarla Intal / Alexander Johnson vs Dominica Olive / Mark Bernard6-4, 6-2
2025-02-01vs HCC HawkstoneWon 20
W#1 DoublesDan Harloff / Carla Intal vs JASON BROMIRSKI / Cara Duffaut6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Tangeman / Stephanie Tangeman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Keith Myers
published
3.46
Ashley Spink
published 3.5
3.37
Enrique Vargas
published 3.5
3.31
Dan Harloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Carla Intal
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Robert Tangeman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.88
Zach Randall
published
2.83
Stephanie Tangeman
published
2.83
2.82
Ivana Simic
published 3
Carmen Cornell
published 3
2.70
Wanda Cross
published
2.54
Scott McMaster
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Myers
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Ashley Spink
133W–63L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Enrique Vargas
32W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Dan Harloff
100W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Carla Intal
112W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Robert Tangeman
146W–71L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Zach Randall
16W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Stephanie Tangeman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Alexander Johnson
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ivana Simic
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Carmen Cornell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Idalhi Barnes-marrero
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wanda Cross
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Isabel Zadezensky
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Scott McMaster
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.