Teams

Cooper-Espy (Tom Brown)

2023 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 3.5W Adult 18 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-28vs Bartens-Khairallah (Golden Eagle)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Julie Espy vs Mariela Bartens / Brenda Jahn5-7, 6-7
2023-06-20vs Leon/Bush//18&Over3.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCandace Beauvais / Julie Espy vs Kelley Corbari / Cindi Giralt6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWanda Eberhart / Catherine Cooper vs Juliana Schneider / Mariann Sabolic5-7, 5-7
2023-06-13vs Simpson (Tom Brown)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Kristy Wheeler vs Leslee Simpson / KC Slay6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs Whitlock (Golden Eagle)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCandace Beauvais / Julie Espy vs Gina Herring / Tracy Propp0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Kristy Wheeler vs Karen de Cardenas / Diane Kobes Houston4-6, 6-7
2023-05-23vs Bartens-Khairallah (Golden Eagle)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristy Wheeler / Julie Espy vs Marie Go / Suzanne Heidepriem2-6, 3-6
2023-05-16vs Leon/Bush//18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Kristy Wheeler vs Paige Saunders / Chansamone Bryant5-7, 6-7
2023-05-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Cooper / Wanda Eberhart vs Melissa Powell / Melissa Bunker2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Julie Espy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Candace Beauvais
published 3.5
3.22
Catherine Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Rosina Cherry
published
3.11
Christelle Roper
published 3.5
2.72
Alyssa Atwood
published 3
Naama Nagar
published
Sally Davis
published
Wanda Eberhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Cooper + Julie Espy13953% games+2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julie Espy
146W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Candace Beauvais
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Catherine Cooper
128W–131L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
Rosina Cherry
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Christelle Roper
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.11
3
Alyssa Atwood
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
Naama Nagar
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Davis
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wanda Eberhart
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.