Teams

IA/Fleming/18&Over9.0X

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 9.0 X 18 over

8 players · average NTRP 5.00 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-01-12vs DiLeoSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisha Coffey / Phillip Arthur Williams vs David Hash / Michele Conlon6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKathryn Zylstra / Thies Kolln vs Alicia Gerke / James Moldenhauer4-6, 2-6
2025-01-05vs DiLeoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPhillip Arthur Williams / Tiffany Williams vs Clinton Young / Michele Conlon5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKathryn Zylstra / Thies Kolln vs Brad DiLeo / Sara Loetscher4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-11-17vs DiLeoLost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Williams / Phillip Arthur Williams vs Terry Shie / Alicia Gerke4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathryn Zylstra / Thies Kolln vs Kay Dileo / Brad DiLeo4-6, 2-6
2024-10-11vs DiLeoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathryn Zylstra / Thomas Wolle vs David Hash / Sara Loetscher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBJ Fleming / Lisha Coffey vs Terry Shie / Alicia Gerke6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-06vs DiLeoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPhillip Arthur Williams / Tiffany Williams vs Alicia Gerke / Terry Shie3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBJ Fleming / Lisha Coffey vs Kay Dileo / Brad DiLeo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 9.0 X 18 over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Fleming/18&Over9.0X328717139
2Boyer3310819156
3Pham/Whipp3381025181
4DiLeo237819147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.29 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
BJ Fleming
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
Heather Fleming
published 5
4.31
Thies Kolln
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Thomas Wolle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Lisha Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathryn Zylstra
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Phillip Arthur Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tiffany Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisha Coffey + BJ Fleming17655% games−13.3% vs expected
Thies Kolln + Kathryn Zylstra3351% gamesnot enough data
Thies Kolln + Tiffany Williams224 matchesnot enough data
Phillip Arthur Williams + Lisha Coffey314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
BJ Fleming
19W–6L career · type M · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.79
5
Heather Fleming
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thies Kolln
49W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Thomas Wolle
20W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Lisha Coffey
57W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Kathryn Zylstra
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phillip Arthur Williams
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tiffany Williams
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.