Teams

SC 5.0W 18 & Over (Walter)

18 & Over · 5.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-13vs UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Thieke / Madison Cook vs Emma Pixley / Jessica Vest6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrooke Walter vs Brittney Desmond2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline Holland / Renee Leacock vs Curran Carver / Amanda Sherman4-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs AATL 5.0W 18 & Over (Ferguson)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Cook / Renee Leacock vs Brennan Ferguson / Jeannette Hammers6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCaroline Holland vs Katie Mason6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Dawson / Meghan Polk vs Kerry Howard / Andrea Mercer6-1, 6-0
2026-06-12vs AATL 5.0W 18 & Over (Ferguson)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Polk / Renee Leacock vs Jeannette Hammers / Andrea Mercer6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Dawson vs Brennan Ferguson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCaroline Holland / Melissa Thieke vs Kerry Howard / Marlene Telesford Gardham6-1, 6-0
2026-06-12vs UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrooke Walter / Alexandra Dawson vs Zoe Campbell / Jessica Vest6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMeghan Polk vs Brittney Desmond2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMelissa Thieke / Madison Cook vs Curran Carver / Emma Pixley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.90
Alexandra Dawson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.84
Melissa Thieke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Brooke Walter
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.72
Renee Leacock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.69
Madison Cook
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.58
Caroline Holland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.27
Meghan Polk
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Alexandra Dawson
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
4.90
Melissa Thieke
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
4.84
5
Brooke Walter
13W–2L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Renee Leacock
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.72
Madison Cook
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
4.69
5
Caroline Holland
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
4.58
Meghan Polk
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
4.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.