Teams

Young-Lyons - Lyons' Pride Tennis Team M3.0

2025 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-10vs Albert - Aces WildeLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrian Hohl / Elmer Buddy Baylor vs Peter Hong / Kevin Ro0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCameron Jacobs vs Sheldon Richardson1-6, 0-6
2025-06-06vs Connor - Not My CourtLost 01
L#3 DoublesElmer Buddy Baylor / Brian Hohl vs Steve Miller / Alexander Sodt1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-02vs Uttenreither - Lord of the StringsLost 01
L#2 SinglesCameron Jacobs vs Kurt Uttenreither1-6, 0-6
2025-05-17vs BrandtLost 01
L#2 SinglesCameron Jacobs vs Frank Barnett1-6, 1-6
2025-04-16vs Connor - Not My CourtLost 01
L#2 SinglesElmer Buddy Baylor vs Yufeng Shen1-6, 5-7
2025-04-10vs BrandtSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCameron Jacobs vs THOMAS AHN0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesElmer Buddy Baylor / John Mason vs Mike Morton / Jean-Philippe Dumont6-4, 7-6
L#2 SinglesCameron Jacobs vs Milad Ebrahimi0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesElmer Buddy Baylor / Raymond Lyons vs Henk Haarmann / Richard Boales3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Matt Martin
published
3.10
Greg Singh
published 3.5
2.91
Bill Keating
published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
2.45
Kirk Wilkerson
published
2.41
Raymond Lyons
published
2.29
Elmer Buddy Baylor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.24
Cameron Jacobs
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Singh + Bill Keating134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
99W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Matt Martin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Greg Singh
14W–26L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Raymond Barry
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kirk Wilkerson
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Raymond Lyons
21W–43L career · no lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Elmer Buddy Baylor
72W–115L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Cameron Jacobs
14W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.