Teams

Paramount Country Club

2023 40&Over Women · 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-10vs Willowbrook Lady LionsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheryl Pilavin / Jodi Sarf vs Pamela Lungen / Christine Marucci2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSheryl Salerno vs Tracy Ji6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-29vs Club Fit Briarcliff: Slice of LifeLost 02
L#1 SinglesSheryl Salerno vs Rebecca Dickson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMeredith Spiegel / Jodi Sarf vs Evamarie Khandji / Jeanette Kim1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSheryl Pilavin / Jodi Sarf vs Karen Healy / Lisa Sacks4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGlenys Contreras vs Ellen Dumark0-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs Birchwood: RacquettesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheryl Pilavin / Jodi Sarf vs Beth Cohen / Coleen Lynam6-2, 6-2
2023-06-06vs TIA GRINDERS 3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesSheryl Salerno vs Dina Rabin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Markiewicz / Glenys Contreras vs Lynne Elcik / Sara Foster5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-30Won 20
W#1 SinglesGlenys Contreras vs Hedy Aronsky6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMeredith Spiegel / Jodi Sarf vs Kristen Seredynski / Nicole Passini6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesArden Glogau / Jodi Sarf vs Stephanie Brensilver / Lana Marks6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesSharon Squitieri / Jodi Sarf vs Summer Weiss / Megan Washington6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Markiewicz / Glenys Contreras vs Ellen Brower / Stacy Rosen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-09vs Ardsley CCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Spiegel / Sheryl Pilavin vs Young-Yi Clinton / Deborah Logozio7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSheryl Salerno vs Lisa Wade6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Eastern/Cornacchia/40&Over3.0W0930616226
2Willowbrook Lady Lions0930617213
3NRRC: Wonder Women0929718235
4Club Fit Briarcliff: Slice of Life0929719222
5West Nyack Tennis: Nice Aces0928721250
6Chestnut Ridge Racquet Club: Smash Hits09251127258
7SPORTIME Westchester HI: Hits & Giggles09241227267
8Club Fit JV ACES09231329305
9Greenwich Racquet club09231230266
10Westchester Avenue Tennis Club: Double Trouble09221330278
11Armonk Tennis: Aces Wild09231332306
12Tennis Club of Hastings: Aces on Hudson09191736275
13Scarsdale GC Aces09191537320
14Orienta: Sets on the Beach09191640321
15Yonkers Tennis: Service With a Smile09171940321
16Pelham Rec: The Forever Ins09181841341
17NRRC: Unmatchables09181741305
18Fairview Country Club: 40-LOVE09171941327
19Saw Mill Club Slammers09181842336
203.0 Tarry Crest09162043321
21Birchwood: Racquettes09161946355
22Paramount Country Club09152147327
23Lakeside Field Club09142150380
24Pleasantville: Slice Girls09102551362
25Ossining Osselots09122452377
26Hampshire Country Club: 3.0 Green09112552343
27Scarsdale Golf Club09112452378
28West Nyack Swim Club: The Terminetters09112454371
29New York Athletic Club:Racqueteers0992756374
30NYAC Sugar and Slice09102656377
31Chappaqua Swim and Tennis - Spin and Tonic0992657386
32Chappaqua Swim and Tennis - Ace Whuppers0982858384
33Yonkers Tennis: Simply Smashing0982858395
34Hampshire Country Club 3.0 Blue0972859396
35Trump National Golf and Tennis: Match Point0982861389

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Sheryl Salerno
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Arden Glogau
published 3
Jodi Sarf
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Sheryl Pilavin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ellie Polack
published
Glenys Contreras
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jan Klein
published
Laurie Markiewicz
published
Meredith Spiegel
published
Michelle Millman
published
Sharon Squitieri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheryl Pilavin + Jodi Sarf10956% games+5.5% vs expected
Arden Glogau + Sharon Squitieri224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheryl Salerno
35W–24L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Arden Glogau
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jodi Sarf
31W–33L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Sheryl Pilavin
27W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ellie Polack
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Glenys Contreras
25W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jan Klein
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laurie Markiewicz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Spiegel
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Millman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Squitieri
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.