Teams

Porter (Deering Bay)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Victoria Ross
published
3.48
Audrey Martinez
published 3.5
3.47
Raysa Marrero
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.38
Karell Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
3.30
Blake Drew
published 3.5
3.28
Donna Golik
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Geraldine Blakely
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Singles 23% · published 3
3.23
Sonnia Viyella
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Karen Zinn
published
3.16
Lelia Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #4 Doubles 22% · published
3.12
Marla Ferreira
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Ivory Shevin
published 3
2.98
Kimberly Fenton
published
2.88
Maria Feldman
published
Cheryl Porter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karell Campbell + Donna Golik6164% games+7.0% vs expected
Lelia Harrington + Karell Campbell101053% games+6.3% vs expected
Raysa Marrero + Donna Golik8454% games+2.3% vs expected
Raysa Marrero + Karell Campbell602258% games+1.5% vs expected
Marla Ferreira + Audrey Martinez3251% games+0.9% vs expected
Karell Campbell + Audrey Martinez7750% games+0.1% vs expected
Audrey Martinez + Blake Drew6449% games−0.1% vs expected
Lelia Harrington + Donna Golik11950% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Ross
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Audrey Martinez
25W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Raysa Marrero
110W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Karell Campbell
227W–147L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Blake Drew
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Donna Golik
61W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3
Geraldine Blakely
134W–53L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.23
Sonnia Viyella
23W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.23
Karen Zinn
13W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Lelia Harrington
127W–132L career · 9 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Marla Ferreira
145W–113L career · 8 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Ivory Shevin
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Kimberly Fenton
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Maria Feldman
19W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.88
Cheryl Porter
32W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.