Teams

HTC HUDNALL

2025 FW Adult 40 & Over League - Ladies · Sunday Ladies 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-01vs WAG STIMMELSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLinda Gleason / Lou Ann Kleiman vs Edith Kruckmann / Jennifer Pine4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKim Kerby-Dickman vs Laura Heibel3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Taylor / Teresa Robinson vs Judy Watts / Amelia Yeh4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRuby Hudnall / Tracy Groves vs Margaret Garcia / Laura Bennett3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-18vs WAG STIMMELLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Huber / Jennifer McNamara vs Carrie Hoogendoorn / Molly Pruner0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Taylor / Teresa Robinson vs Heather Steele Curtis / Jennifer Pine3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKim Kerby-Dickman / Mary Duffy vs Laura Bennett / Judy Watts6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Sunday Ladies 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Mary Duffy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Patti Hart
published
3.73
Teresa Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Gilda Tebeaux
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
published
3.66
Aya Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Tracy Groves
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Linda Gleason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Kim Kerby-Dickman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Rita Hudson
published
3.49
Jaime Marinaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.38
Kay Lewis
published
3.34
Jennifer McNamara
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Susan Huber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Ruby Hudnall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lou Ann Kleiman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Groves + Patti Hart6260% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Duffy
20W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Patti Hart
15W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Teresa Robinson
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Gilda Tebeaux
34W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
25W–26L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Aya Singleton
32W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.66
Tracy Groves
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Linda Gleason
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
Kim Kerby-Dickman
11W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Rita Hudson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.51
Jaime Marinaro
40W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Kay Lewis
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
Jennifer McNamara
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34
Susan Huber
15W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Ruby Hudnall
22W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Lou Ann Kleiman
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.