Teams

DCC/Carlson M4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-05vs Bent Tree/Wilder-Howard M4.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesNeal Konker vs Brian Sarche6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Edward Harris / Kevin Riley vs Christopher Smith / Neil Clay1-6, 1-6
2024-10-26vs JCC/Cytron M4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChase Conway / Neal Konker vs CJ Ramsey / Michael Roberts6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesByron Dunn Jr. / John Edward Harris vs Dan O'Donnell / Mark Wettreich1-6, 3-6
2024-10-19vs Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M4.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesStew Fuller vs Adam Crane6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWilson Vick / Bayard Friedman vs Matthew Criss / Robert Moehler3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesZane Carlson / Kevin Riley vs Robert Fitzgerald / Alex Tatge1-6, 2-6
2024-10-12vs McKinney/McDonald M4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChase Conway / Neal Konker vs Wah Jeung / Mason Utley3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesZane Carlson vs Samuel Hussein0-1
L#2 DoublesRexford Alexander / Bayard Friedman vs Gregg Mills / Patrick Teterud6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-05vs L B Houston/Perumalla-Tadal M4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesStew Fuller / Chris Sears vs Satya Gade / Payne Spudic4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZane Carlson / John Arnold vs James Tadal / Sai Madhav Perumalla6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Edward Harris / Kevin Riley vs OMKAR DESAI / Jose Nader0-6, 2-6
2024-09-21vs Greenhill/Dominguez-Alarcon M4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesZane Carlson / John Klein vs Nathan Lim / Joe Giovino4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStew Fuller vs Krishna Pamarthi1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWilson Vick / Bayard Friedman vs Cody Alarcon / Andrew Sumarsono3-6, 3-6
2024-09-07vs T bar M/Klinger M4.0Lost 04
L#1 DoublesTaylor Hunt / Neal Konker vs David Ashton / Stephen Raggio3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesZane Carlson vs David Brown4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBayard Friedman / John Arnold vs Mike Sullivan / William Miranda3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRexford Alexander / Byron Dunn Jr. vs Brandon Klinger / Inderpal Sarkaria2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings33 teams · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McKinney/Patel-Van Ham M4.07021714169
2Oak Creek/Chopra M4.07022615207
3JCC/Cytron M4.06123513176
4Brookhaven/Bartlett M4.06121718206
5LB Houston/Gupta-Chava M4.06123519206
6LifeTime Frisco/Trang M4.061181020202
7Chandlers Landing/Stasiak M4.051141022212
8LifeTime Plano/Nair-Epperson M4.05219920217
9The Nelson/Harner-Vittitow M4.052181022193
10DAC/Jahanbin-Kraft M4.052181023228
11North Texas Racquet Club/Cox-Llambias M4.05220823233
12MacArthur HS/Movva-Vustipalli M4.042121225214
13Greenhill/Dominguez-Alarcon M4.043171125254
14Huffhines/Ngo-Wong M4.043171126264
15Greenhill/Ohl M4.034131533254
16Seay/Hinterlong M4.034151333255
17Lone Star HS/Reddy M4.034131533250
18McKinney/McDonald M4.034131533258
19Huffhines/Yeoh-Obinwa M4.034131536260
20SpringPark/Legatowicz-McGowan M4.034101840280
21L B Houston/Perumalla-Tadal M4.025151333281
22Canyon Creek/Cotter-Red M4.025121635275
23Lakes/Hurd M4.025121637277
24McKinney/Clifton M4.025111740285
25T bar M/Klinger M4.02591940279
26El Dorado/Miles-Brasuell M4.025101840285
27Brookhaven/McGee M4.02591941297
28Greenhill/Montalvo-Smith M4.02572144291
29Bent Tree/Wilder-Howard M4.02672550324
30High Point/Gordon M4.01662249316
31DCC/Carlson M4.00122435
32McKinney/Skinner-Possehl M4.00772144294
33Oak Creek/Wang-Yeoh M4.00712754321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bayard Friedman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Chase Conway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Byron Dunn Jr.
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Edward Harris
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Riley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Neal Konker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Rexford Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Stew Fuller
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Wilson Vick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Zane Carlson
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bayard Friedman
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chase Conway
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Byron Dunn Jr.
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Edward Harris
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Riley
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Neal Konker
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rexford Alexander
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stew Fuller
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wilson Vick
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zane Carlson
2W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.