Teams

Cromer - TRC

2025 NETX Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-27vs Green -FaulknerLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Cromer / Judy Tschirhart vs Linda Miller / Suzy Trimble6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Resnik / Connie McMillin vs Joyce Mallory / Janice Rogers1-6, 2-6
2025-09-20vs Green -FaulknerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Becky Berry vs Suzy Trimble / Debra McKinley6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStacy Cromer / Rhonda Davis vs Janice Rogers / Joyce Mallory2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Resnik / Judy Tschirhart vs Mary Dyess / Nina Martin2-6, 2-6
2025-09-13vs Green -FaulknerLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Becky Berry vs Linda Miller / Suzy Trimble3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Resnik / Connie McMillin vs Candice Gast Wilcox / Janice Rogers6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Cook / Jane Ball vs Yumiko Green / Joyce Mallory3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-07vs Green -FaulknerLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Becky Berry vs Linda Miller / Shannon Lutmer7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesConnie McMillin / Stacy Cromer vs Mary Dyess / Nina Martin1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Cook / Jane Ball vs Yumiko Green / Joyce Mallory4-6, 4-6
2025-08-23vs Green -FaulknerWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Becky Berry vs Janice Rogers / Mary Dyess6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacy Cromer / Pam Phinny vs Suzy Trimble / Debra McKinley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Cook / Jane Ball vs Candice Gast Wilcox / Patty Schnittker6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Becky Berry
published 4
3.21
Stacy Cromer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Connie McMillin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Jill Hamil
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.88
Judy Tschirhart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Melinda Ross
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jane Ball
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Resnik
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Pam Phinny
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Hamil + Melinda Ross314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Berry
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Cromer
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Connie McMillin
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jill Hamil
38W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Judy Tschirhart
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
Melinda Ross
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Jane Ball
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Resnik
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pam Phinny
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.