Teams

Isch

2025 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-28vs Ball Striker 6.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichie Wang / Kelly Ryan vs Charles Mandeville / Stephanie Baker3-6, 0-6
2025-03-16vs Ball Striker 6.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Gowen / Richie Wang vs Kelly Kennedy / Charles Mandeville2-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs LancoonWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrenae Fadden / Richie Wang vs Kelly Swartout / Robert Struble7-6, 4-2
2025-01-04vs WalshLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrenae Fadden / Richie Wang vs Aine McKee / Gregory Teal2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Scott A Green
published
3.44
Ken Mitchell
published
3.33
Brenae Fadden
published 3.5
3.25
Andrew Isch
published 3.5
2.89
Regan Lonchena
published
2.82
Richie Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Damien Morris
published 3
2.56
Matt Gogarty
published
2.53
Kelly Ryan
published
2.40
Cathy Hoffman
published 2.5
2.28
Kristopher Wenn
published
Erin Isch
published
Kimberly Gowen
published
Todd Trapnell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Isch + Erin Isch033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott A Green
39W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
Ken Mitchell
15W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Brenae Fadden
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Andrew Isch
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Regan Lonchena
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Richie Wang
71W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Damien Morris
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Matt Gogarty
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.56
Kelly Ryan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.53
2.5
Cathy Hoffman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Kristopher Wenn
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
Erin Isch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Gowen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Trapnell
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.