Teams

Herrera/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 5.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM

13 players · average NTRP 2.79 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-08vs Pendergraft/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAbigail Hale / Alix Cross vs Sarah Ann Pendergraft / Rita Spellings4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGrace van Winkle / Tiffany Chen vs Katie Claiborne / Jenny Hamrick6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeah Riek / Haley Fairman vs Elizabeth Derck / Michelle Nealy6-2, 6-3
2025-08-11vs Pendergraft/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Herrera / Anna Miller vs Michelle Nealy / Ashley Kirkland6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCarey Hoover / Leah Riek vs Margaret Emley / Jenny Hamrick6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women - FRI AM & MON PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
2.60
Grace van Winkle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
2.59
Haley Fairman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Alicia Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Carey Hoover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Anna Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.46
Stacey Appiah-opoku
published
2.32
Alix Cross
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Leah Riek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Abigail Hale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.16
Alex Barron
published 2.5
2.05
Toni Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carey Hoover + Anna Miller123 matchesnot enough data
Carey Hoover + Leah Riek123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Louise Cranwell
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Grace van Winkle
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
LaTanya Sandy Johnson
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Haley Fairman
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Alicia Herrera
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Carey Hoover
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.49
2.5
Anna Miller
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%58%42%
2.47
Stacey Appiah-opoku
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Alix Cross
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%90%10%
2.32
Leah Riek
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.30
3
Abigail Hale
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29
2.5
Alex Barron
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Toni Kim
4W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.