Teams

CGardner/Rivera (Life Time)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Thurs PM

9 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-06vs SMacIntosh (Charlotte Indoor)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJarrett Meadors / Anatoly Zelepouga vs Scott MacIntosh / Mike Drezek6-2, 6-0
2022-09-29vs DTyson (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Jarrett Meadors vs Nigel Zheng / Iggy Levelev6-1, 6-0
2022-09-22vs PKartes (Mountainbrook)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Jordan Teel vs Ben Senn / Patrick Kartes6-3, 6-3
2022-09-15vs GPawlush (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Nate Siens vs Scott Waldrop / Randy Barrett6-4, 6-1
2022-09-01vs JDichak (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Jordan Teel vs Chris Landy / Ben Gilchrist6-0, 6-0
2022-08-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Jordan Teel vs Arun Gopinathan / Sujit Vakkalanka6-2, 6-0
2022-08-18vs DDemaine (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Charles Manning vs Austin Miller / Jim Yablonski6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-11vs MChaney (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnatoly Zelepouga / Nate Siens vs Michael Moloney / Jarret Lewis6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Anatoly Zelepouga
usually #1 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 5
4.23
Christopher Gardner
published 4.5
3.92
Jarrett Meadors
published 4
3.78
Nate Siens
published 4
Franklin Lim
published 4
Graham Webster
published 4
3.74
Jordan Teel
published
3.72
Charles Manning
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anatoly Zelepouga + Christopher Gardner5063% games+1.1% vs expected
Anatoly Zelepouga + Nate Siens4159% gamesnot enough data
Jordan Teel + Jarrett Meadors303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anatoly Zelepouga
217W–58L career · 22 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
4.59
4.5
Christopher Gardner
39W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Jarrett Meadors
72W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Nate Siens
167W–75L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Andrew VanDerveer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Franklin Lim
5W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Graham Webster
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jordan Teel
31W–28L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Charles Manning
18W–22L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.