Teams

VC YELLOW

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

5 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-21vs CHCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarissa Hornbeck / Bailey Barclay vs Elizabeth Morton / Stacey Knox3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Portenga / Katie Schneck vs Brooke O'Donnell / Cindy Wells3-6, 2-6
2025-08-14vs HW GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesTi Mougne / Bailey Barclay vs Meredith van Wyk / Daniele Dattilo1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Portenga vs Kiki Faircloth4-6, 1-6
2025-08-07vs PTC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesTi Mougne / Bailey Barclay vs Su Mei Chen / Tracy Pursell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKatie Portenga vs Sofia Boada7-6, 6-3
2025-07-31vs EM REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesBailey Barclay / Katie Portenga vs Michele Olree / Katy Kappler2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-24vs ATC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesBailey Barclay / Katie Portenga vs Tami Beardsley / Megan Lynch1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTi Mougne vs Ashley Peterson5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HRCA-N WHITE7015617169
2HRCA-S BLACK6014414130
3JCC GREEN6116513140
4PTC BLUE52111024191
5CCC YELLOW4314719160
6GAC ORANGE4312920169
7PRC ORANGE4313824199
8CP PINK4312924182
9HFII BLACK3412921183
10HRCA-N PINK34111022179
11HIW GREEN34111024197
12BTA-IBM PURPLE34101124200
13HV NAVY3491227209
14HFII GOLD3491227195
15PCC NAVY3481329204
16WP PINK2591226190
17LEBTC PURPLE2581328214
18CP PURPLE2561532219
19GCC PURPLE1551330200
20HG PINK1651633218
21VC YELLOW0712040252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Ti Mougne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Katie Portenga
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.04
Katie Sznewajs
published 3.5
3.04
Carissa Hornbeck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katie Schneck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ti Mougne + Carissa Hornbeck0537% games−6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ti Mougne
57W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Katie Portenga
30W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Katie Sznewajs
36W–30L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Carissa Hornbeck
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Katie Schneck
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.