Teams

COASTSIDE TA/HALF MOON BAY HS 40MX6.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesMishelle Westendorf / Basudeb Ghosh vs Stephanie Patterson / Chris Thom6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSteve Owen / Leslie Wakasa vs Steven Carbullido / Surabhi Agrawal7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-08vs SAN CARLOS TC/CARLMONT HS 40MX6.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesEliot Johnson / Letizia Pileggi vs Dennis Louie / Eun Soo Lim2-6, 4-6
2025-07-06vs SAN CARLOS TC/CARLMONT HS 40MX6.0ALost 02
L#1 DoublesDerek Hillstrom / Letizia Pileggi vs Dennis Louie / Phuong Nguyen4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRobb Fox / Nancy Economopoulos vs Marcos Pearson / Victoria Vanina0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Derek Hillstrom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Robb Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Leslie Wakasa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.88
Nancy Economopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Marty Mullarkey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Mishelle Westendorf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Tina Freschi
published
2.71
Basudeb Ghosh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Letizia Pileggi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Steve Owen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Wakasa + Basudeb Ghosh224 matchesnot enough data
Basudeb Ghosh + Mishelle Westendorf224 matchesnot enough data
Letizia Pileggi + Steve Owen213 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Wakasa + Steve Owen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Derek Hillstrom
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Robb Fox
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Leslie Wakasa
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
Nancy Economopoulos
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Marty Mullarkey
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.81
Mishelle Westendorf
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
Tina Freschi
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Basudeb Ghosh
15W–20L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.71
Letizia Pileggi
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Owen
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.