Teams

BC-Clemente

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-11-01vs WSC-CarlsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaine Tsujii / Jim Tjelle vs Stuart Cobb / Justin Craciunoiu3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Watson / Joe Bilsborough vs Eric Botterbusch / David Higginbotham3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Trippel / Michael Sekins vs Steve Eggerman / George Bond2-6, 0-6
2020-10-24vs MC-Hammer Heads 3Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAlan Fulp / Kurt Larson vs Roger Mark / Noel Balantac5-7, 4-5
L#2 DoublesShawn Meeks / Joe Bilsborough vs James Gunther / Seth Fulcher3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRace McKee / Mick Jaeger vs Terry Ward / Alvin Sato1-6, 6-7
2020-10-17vs RBW-Bowen/MarshLost 12
L#1 DoublesGregory Olsen / Robert Moline vs Stephen Peringer / Vincent Yee6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTom Clemente / Mick Jaeger vs Norm Escover / David Pogue7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Manning / Douglas Trippel vs BOB BOWEN / Bruce Colley4-6, 3-6
2020-10-11vs HBSQ-CoghlanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJim Tjelle / Laine Tsujii vs Paul Reni / Dennis Salveson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Watson / Kurt Larson vs Don Little / Michael Liner5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Sekins / Race McKee vs Daniel Rutter / Steven Gordon2-6, 0-6
2020-10-04vs STC-SladehammerLost 03
L#1 DoublesGregory Olsen / Alan Fulp vs Michael Steele / Rob Green0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Moline / Shawn Meeks vs Douglas Smith / Peter Wachter3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Bilsborough / Douglas Trippel vs Michael Slade / John Cunningham2-6, 4-6
2020-09-26vs CAC/SL-55 StanleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaine Tsujii / Jim Tjelle vs Martin Ruscha / Ray Heitzman2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlan Fulp / Kurt Larson vs Thomas Stanley / Daniel Murray6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesA C / Gregory Olsen vs Chris Lloyd / Colin Bronemann6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2020-09-20vs BETC-HoefelLost 12
L#1 DoublesJim Tjelle / Laine Tsujii vs Benny Viloria / Bill Houser6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGregory Olsen / Robert Moline vs Mike Hoefel / Scott Gunderson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShawn Meeks / Joe Bilsborough vs Carlos Lacayo / Mark Furumasu6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesShawn Meeks / Jim Tjelle vs James Shields / John Follis6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTom Clemente / Daniel Watson vs Joseph Ching / Steven Kim2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Sekins / Scott Manning vs Ed Bianchi / Bindu Purhar1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Joe Bilsborough
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Robert Moline
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Jim Tjelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Mick Jaeger
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.64
Laine Tsujii
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Shawn Meeks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Kurt Larson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Douglas Trippel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Tom Clemente
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.61
Scott Manning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Michael Sekins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Alan Fulp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Daniel Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gregory Olsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Clemente + Shawn Meeks1935% games−2.7% vs expected
Douglas Trippel + Daniel Watson0529% games−8.2% vs expected
Michael Sekins + Scott Manning01021% games−14.7% vs expected
Jim Tjelle + Laine Tsujii2545% gamesnot enough data
Shawn Meeks + Alan Fulp2444% gamesnot enough data
Joe Bilsborough + Shawn Meeks134 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Trippel + Scott Manning033 matchesnot enough data
Robert Moline + Shawn Meeks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joe Bilsborough
74W–83L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Robert Moline
24W–21L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jim Tjelle
68W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Mick Jaeger
96W–92L career · 5 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Laine Tsujii
29W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Shawn Meeks
61W–82L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Kurt Larson
14W–23L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Douglas Trippel
1W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Tom Clemente
75W–151L career · 4 lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Scott Manning
17W–73L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Michael Sekins
9W–62L career · 6 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
2.54
0
Alan Fulp
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Daniel Watson
5W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gregory Olsen
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.