Teams

MTS:Constantin

2026 NH Adult 55 & Over Men · 7.0 Men 2

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-02vs MITC:NotDeadYet:MerrowLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard King / Jason Stadler vs Scott Herstad / John Teixeira6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Robinson / Daniel Scharpf vs Thomas Merrow / Alex Dorchies6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Richard Aseltine vs Brooks Place / Mark Manley6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-04-25vs NPT:DeaconWon 21
W#1 DoublesRichard King / Jason Stadler vs Bill Best / Dave Langley6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaniel Scharpf / Peter Reid vs Ted Farnham / Gregg Norris6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Scott Reid vs Stephen Hoar / Jeffrey Paul7-6, 6-2
2026-04-18vs RVC:Nabinger:AlewineLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard King / Jason Stadler vs Sean Alewine / Jamie Roser3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Robinson / Daniel Scharpf vs Daniel Millstone / Doug Phillips2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Peter Reid vs Kurt Gantrish / Michael Fokas4-6, 4-6
2026-04-11vs RVC:Nabinger:AlewineLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard King / Jason Stadler vs Sean Alewine / Daniel Millstone7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesScott Robinson / Daniel Scharpf vs Robert Nabinger / Doug Phillips3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeter Podesta / Richard Aseltine vs Rod Lovely / Terry Gould6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-21vs MITC:NotDeadYet:MerrowLost 02
L#2 DoublesPeter Podesta / Richard Aseltine vs Kary Shumway / Brooks Place3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Constantin / Daniel Scharpf vs Robert Beck / Edward Surprenant0-6, 2-6
2026-02-21vs NPT:DeaconLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Peter Podesta vs James Scammon / Bill Best1-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs MITC:NotDeadYet:MerrowLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaniel Scharpf / Richard Aseltine vs Thomas Merrow / Alex Dorchies3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-24vs RVC:Nabinger:AlewineLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard King / Jason Stadler vs Daniel Millstone / Sean Alewine2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesScott Robinson / Daniel Scharpf vs Radu Stan / Kurt Gantrish6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Peter Podesta vs Rod Lovely / Salvatore Costa3-6, 3-6
2026-01-03vs NPT:DeaconLost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Aseltine / Daniel Scharpf vs Ted Farnham / Stephen Hoar5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men 2 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Peter Podesta
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.19
Jason Stadler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Daniel Scharpf
usually #2 Doubles 90%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.09
Richard Aseltine
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
James Constantin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Peter Reid
published
Richard King
published
Scott Reid
published
Scott Robinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Aseltine + Peter Podesta71048% games−6.9% vs expected
Richard Aseltine + James Constantin134 matchesnot enough data
Peter Podesta + Daniel Scharpf123 matchesnot enough data
Peter Podesta + James Constantin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Podesta
54W–88L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Jason Stadler
40W–37L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Daniel Scharpf
30W–46L career · 10 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
Richard Aseltine
50W–63L career · 7 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
James Constantin
21W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Peter Reid
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard King
28W–52L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Reid
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Robinson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.