Teams

300 Smith

2025 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-15vs Alachua/Fongyi/3.5/3.0/2.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Choate / Paul Lipori vs Yan Xia / Eren Chang6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMehmet Genc / Adam Lites vs Peter Zhou / Thanakon UThai6-7, 2-6
2025-03-02vs WS The Dark Side BizarroLost 01
L#3 DoublesMehmet Genc / Hari Parvataneni vs Zach Randall / Shaun Files4-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs Alachua/Fongyi/3.5/3.0/2.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Choate / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Eren Chang / Yaotian Zhang6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs WS The Dark Side BizarroLost 01
L#1 DoublesRafael Libunao / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Donovan Bailey / David Cianci5-7, 4-6
2025-02-09vs Alachua/Fongyi/3.5/3.0/2.5MSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaul Lipori / Kevin Choate vs Yan Xia / Yaotian Zhang3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMehmet Genc / Adam Lites vs Peter Zhou / Randy Hu3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-31vs Alachua/Fongyi/3.5/3.0/2.5MLost 01
L#3 DoublesMehmet Genc / Martin Noguera vs Randy Hu / Peter Zhou1-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs WS The Dark Side BizarroLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteven Smith / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Nathan Miller / Richard Madolid2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Lawrence Hooghuis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Rick Carlson
published
3.10
Paul Lipori
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Rafael Libunao
published
2.98
Dieter Haager
published 3
2.94
Chris Redding
published 3
2.82
HEE-SUNG BAE
published
2.81
Rajesh Gurrala
published
2.77
Shawn Gaston
published
2.72
Conor O'Dwyer
published 3
2.64
Sergei Tevosian
published
2.62
Martin Noguera
published
2.38
Mehmet Genc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lawrence Hooghuis
53W–134L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Rick Carlson
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
3.5
Paul Lipori
99W–72L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Rafael Libunao
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Dieter Haager
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Chris Redding
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
HEE-SUNG BAE
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Rajesh Gurrala
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Shawn Gaston
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Conor O'Dwyer
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Sergei Tevosian
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Martin Noguera
10W–12L career · no lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
2.5
Mehmet Genc
44W–92L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.