Teams

LA - Tightly Strung Mixed

2025 USTA MxD 40 & Over - LA · LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles

28 players · average NTRP 3.19 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-17vs LA - Mooney Mates Mixed TapeWon 21
W#1 DoublesSacha Emanuel / Vanessa Bustillos vs Seng Rimpakone / Daniel Meyer6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDiana Winters / Kevin Luc vs Jeorgina Eleazar / Howard Stein6-0, 6-1
L#3 Doublespeter johnson / Michele Moshay vs AMY THOMPSON / Dayton Parcells5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-10vs LA - Canyon Coyotes 7.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBita Nasseri / Shawn Nasseri vs Joy Cho / Albert Hsu1-6, 2-6
2025-08-02vs LA - Mooney Mates Mixed TapeWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Jensen / Mike Jensen vs Seng Rimpakone / Christopher Schrader6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMICHELLE BERGREN / Peter Bergren vs Jeorgina Eleazar / Brian Krechman7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEdward Simpson / Kandus Simpson vs Julie Rhee / Daniel Meyer2-6, 0-6
2025-07-26vs LA - Marina Racquet ClubWon 21
W#1 DoublesLara Azzopardi / Chase Robinson vs Amy Mucha / Kern Wasan6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMorgan Handel / Sacha Emanuel vs Maggie Nemser / Gustaf Rounick6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesVanessa Bustillos / David Victor vs Nika Zaitseva / Neeraj Sood2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBita Nasseri / Shawn Nasseri vs Edmond Avedisian / Margie Englis0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 7.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Peter Bergren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Mike Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Jenelle Lindsay
published
3.30
Sacha Emanuel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Chase Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dan Frysh
published 3.5
David Victor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kate Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Nadine Ellman
published
3.17
MICHELLE BERGREN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Kendra Jackson
published
3.14
Kevin Luc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Lara Azzopardi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Karen Minikes
published
2.91
Vanessa Bustillos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Shawn Nasseri
published
2.88
Anne Tlusty
published 3
2.86
Bita Nasseri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Edward Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kyoko Arikura
published
2.68
Morgan Handel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Beryl Mendelson
published 3
2.61
Diana Winters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Kandus Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Michele Moshay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Garrigan
published
Todd Beiley
published
peter johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Bustillos + Jenelle Lindsay5068% games+8.2% vs expected
Vanessa Bustillos + Bita Nasseri224 matchesnot enough data
Kate Jensen + Mike Jensen134 matchesnot enough data
Peter Bergren + Mike Jensen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Peter Bergren
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Mike Jensen
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jenelle Lindsay
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Sacha Emanuel
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Chase Robinson
2W–0L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dan Frysh
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Victor
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kate Jensen
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Nadine Ellman
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
MICHELLE BERGREN
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Kendra Jackson
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.14
Kevin Luc
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
Lara Azzopardi
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
Karen Minikes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Vanessa Bustillos
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Shawn Nasseri
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Anne Tlusty
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Bita Nasseri
22W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Edward Simpson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kyoko Arikura
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.71
Morgan Handel
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Beryl Mendelson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Diana Winters
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kandus Simpson
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Michele Moshay
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Patrick Garrigan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Beiley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
peter johnson
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.