Teams

BCC Aces

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 4.0 Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-26vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#2 DoublesE Molly Hemsley / Cindee Smith vs TERESA Marshall / Lorali Barber1-6, 2-6
2025-03-21vs Norbeck PurpleLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Horowitz / Monica Brenneman vs Nancy Hull / Jackie Solomon3-6, 1-6
2025-03-13vs Tennis SharksLost 02
L#1 DoublesKirsten Propst / Monica Brenneman vs JoAnn Perry / Nancy Trainer6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindee Smith / Patricia Rose vs Karyn DeVito / Kari Whitney3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-13vs Manor 4.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Katharine Marino vs Cammie Condell / Cathy Ventrell-Monsees1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesE Molly Hemsley / Cindee Smith vs Sherri Dixon / Amy Burgoyne3-6, 5-5
2025-02-07vs The EdgeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Kaeli Duggan vs Poli Noyes / Raina Fishbane6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCindee Smith / Audrey Yen vs Claire Merril / Cheng Hoon Lim6-7, 1-6
2025-01-27vs Congressional 4.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBridget Foist / Kay Han vs Erika Psacharopoulos / Haas Wallace6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Davison / Katharine Marino vs Kary Magruder / Kimberly Ocampo0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSandy Horowitz / Patricia Rose vs Teresa Figgs / Lynda Suffoletta2-6, 4-6
2025-01-23vs Power SmashLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Rehmann / Monica Brenneman vs Anto Faini / Robin Brille4-6, 3-6
2025-01-09vs WGCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKay Han / Jill Lavin vs Allison Zidlicky / Katherine Price2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Rose / Kirsten Propst vs Kathleen Ricchetti / Lisa Nardini7-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesKim Rehmann / Sandy Horowitz vs Jackie Chipman / Valerie Penney6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Kathryn L Boothe
published
Bridget Foist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Elizabeth Hunter
published
3.68
Kathi Teitelbaum
published
3.60
Kirsten Propst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Katharine Marino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Lisa Davison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Kim Rehmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cindee Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Monica Brenneman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Audrey Yen
published 3.5
3.25
Patricia Rose
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Sandy Horowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
E Molly Hemsley
published
Jill Lavin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kaeli Duggan
published
Kay Han
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sari Taft
published
Susie Barnello
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn L Boothe
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Bridget Foist
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Hunter
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kathi Teitelbaum
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Kirsten Propst
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.60
Katharine Marino
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Lisa Davison
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kim Rehmann
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cindee Smith
49W–38L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Monica Brenneman
46W–30L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Audrey Yen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Rose
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
E Molly Hemsley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Lavin
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kaeli Duggan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kay Han
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sari Taft
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susie Barnello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.