Teams

2 MAC Pettit

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-18vs 12 MTC SanderSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJay Pettit / Walter Norwood vs Greg Moody / Chris Pecci4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Kim Boys vs Leon Cella / Michael Sander6-3, 7-5
2022-06-07vs 16 Woodlake McCoySplit 11
W#2 DoublesErich Yost / Jay Pettit vs Chris Hayes / Rafael Garrido6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Douglas Rosenberg vs John Kim / Frank Dekker6-7, 2-6
2022-05-17vs 10 Willow Oaks StallsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeremy Calbreath / Erich Yost vs Agustin Rodriguez / Terence Blackwood6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-10vs 8 ACAC Hatcher / CipollaLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Barefoot / Walter Norwood vs Jesse Smith / John Delisio5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesErich Yost / Kim Boys vs Dave Bucheit / Glenn Pfluger0-6, 5-7
2022-05-03vs 6 Avalon Ghita 3.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTom Rider / Walter Norwood vs Brad Williamson / Brent Belding6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Aric Mueller
published 4
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.43
Jeremy Calbreath
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Erich Yost
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Darrell Eakes
published 3.5
3.32
John Barefoot
published
3.10
Jay Pettit
published
3.03
Chad Wolff
published 3
3.03
Walter Norwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Kim Boys
published
Scott Terrell
published
Tom Rider
published
Zach Pettit
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aric Mueller
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jeremy Calbreath
164W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Erich Yost
142W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Darrell Eakes
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
John Barefoot
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Jay Pettit
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Chad Wolff
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
Walter Norwood
100W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kim Boys
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.81
Scott Terrell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tom Rider
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Zach Pettit
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.