Teams

Biedenharn/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-09vs JLewis/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesLouise Biedenharn / Shibahn Rodda vs Terry Bondurant / Barbara Wilson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebekah Shappley vs Susan Reyna6-1, 6-0
2026-05-02vs Nelson/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesLouise Biedenharn / Emily Edge vs Cathy Herrington / Allison Palazola6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAllison Ann Klawinski vs Julia McDonald6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShibahn Rodda / Tara Hallie Ware vs Amanda Nelson / Adee Davis6-4, 7-5
2026-04-25vs Taylor/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouise Biedenharn / Erin Morrison vs Katie Campbell / Zoe Harrison5-7, 1-6
2026-04-22vs Blanton/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesLouise Biedenharn / Erin Morrison vs Karen Hamburger / Beverly Kimbrough1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRebekah Shappley / Whitney Wieck vs Renee DeGutis / Greer Moyes3-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs Justice/MemphisLost 02
L#1 SinglesRebekah Shappley vs Katie Howell3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShibahn Rodda / Gray Byrd vs Sarah Reed / Rachel Veteto4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-11vs Flynt/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLouise Biedenharn / Shelton Wittenberg vs Francesca Bengert / Amanda Whittington6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebekah Shappley vs Tanner Baker0-6, 3-6
2026-04-04vs Cleveland/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesLouise Biedenharn / Erin Morrison vs Christa Smith / Cody Lambert6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAllison Ann Klawinski vs Morgan Baker7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShelton Wittenberg / Shibahn Rodda vs Madison Cleveland / Lauren Downs6-4, 6-2
2026-03-28vs SLewis/MemphisLost 02
L#1 SinglesRebekah Shappley vs Casey Gleysteen5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShibahn Rodda / Tara Hallie Ware vs Jennie Silk / Marianne Smith3-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs Wright/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Morrison / Shibahn Rodda vs Estelle Mitchell / Alecia Monett6-4, 7-5
2026-03-07vs Ray/MemphisLost 01
L#1 SinglesShibahn Rodda vs Rachel Crawford1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 2.5 Women 18 & over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Taylor/Memphis64171329227
2Biedenharn/Memphis64141635290
3Dahlgren/Memphis5212922178
4JLewis/Memphis55161431249
5Powers/Memphis4312922183
6Nelson/Memphis1982246311
7Ferrara/Memphis0751635219

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Shibahn Rodda
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.28
Louise Biedenharn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Ann Klawinski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Rebekah Shappley
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shibahn Rodda
6W–10L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Louise Biedenharn
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Allison Ann Klawinski
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rebekah Shappley
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.