Teams

Crooked Creek (Kim Wildstein)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Maureen Gold)

22 players · average NTRP 3.71 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-04vs Foxworth (Kristin Funt)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Stucke / Ellen de Bliek vs Natalie Baker / Kristen Albert6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Tindle vs Nevada Serra6-0, 6-1
L#4 DoublesKim Wildstein / Sallie Blum vs Anne Johnson / Nina Moses6-4, 3-6, 5-7
2026-01-16vs Crooked Creek (Melissa Holman)*Won 31
L#1 DoublesSigrid Gehrig / Suzie Hill vs Lauren Lummus / Megan Melchiors4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEllen de Bliek / Nina Harteveld vs Amy Paul / Emily Harrell6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCarly Sedney / Julie Tindle vs Kris Grosman / Kelly Spiller6-3, 6-1
W#4 DoublesHeidi Stucke / Lori Colapietro vs Joelle Corcoran / Kim Plaziak6-3, 6-1
2026-01-08vs Jefferson Township (Kim Carney)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesEllen de Bliek / Vanessa Haak vs Judy Hampton / Christine Michaels6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesVicky Vallejo / Lori Colapietro vs Emily Rogers / Jennifer Vorhies2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKarlie Wetherington / Julie Tindle vs Kimberly Carney / Kelly Finley6-7, 6-2, 1-6
L#4 DoublesJennfier Toeppner / Heleen Honeyborne vs Joy Walsh / Leontien Visser1-6, 3-6
2025-12-11vs Brookfield (Suzanne Ashton)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesVicky Vallejo / Kristin Haak vs Alice McQuade / Kelsey Moody3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSuzie Hill / Cindy Maynard vs Jackie Blyth / Jean Kahn2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarly Sedney / Julie Tindle vs Paula Hope / Debbie Turner6-4, 6-2
2025-12-04vs Wexford (Alison O'Connell)*Lost 14
L#1 DoublesKristin Haak / Ellen de Bliek vs Joy Patterson / Pamela Self1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeleen Honeyborne vs Kim Mora3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie King / Vicky Vallejo vs Nicole Koviak / Amy Strahan6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Tindle / Carly Sedney vs Diane Rice / Susan Webb6-7, 1-6
L#4 DoublesSusana Albisu / Jennfier Toeppner vs Aubrie Mayeux / Elisia van Scoter0-6, 0-6
2025-11-20vs Bradshaw Farm (Van Johnson)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesKristin Haak / Sigrid Gehrig vs Maureen Laselva / Leslie Dobeis6-3, 0-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesConnie Land vs Jeanne Putzel6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElaine Welch / Heleen Honeyborne vs Van Johnson / Nancy Vining6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNatalie King / Carly Sedney vs Pamela Tracy / Tiana Pauline6-3, 5-7, 7-6
L#4 DoublesKim Wildstein / Heidi Stucke vs Theresa Ford / Lisa Gardner2-2
2025-11-13vs White Columns (Jody Joyce)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesKristin Haak / Vicky Vallejo vs Lindsey Ferguson / Regina Drollette5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Colapietro / Heidi Stucke vs April Adriansen / Christina Silverman6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSuzie Hill / Elaine Welch vs Amy Fahey / Ann Gridley6-2, 2-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesCarly Sedney / Kim Wildstein vs Michelle Smith / Meg Smith6-2, 2-6, 5-7
2025-11-06vs Harrison TC (Lisa Link)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesSigrid Gehrig / Heidi Stucke vs Jennifer Piendel / Nina Chopra4-6, 6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJulie Tindle vs Nancy Crim2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVicky Vallejo / Kristin Haak vs Melanie Williams / Karen Pline6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLori Colapietro / Ellen de Bliek vs Shireen Wright / Mylinda Royalty6-3, 3-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Maureen Gold) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Natalie King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Lori Colapietro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Connie Land
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Heidi Stucke
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.72
Julie Tindle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.72
Vicky Vallejo
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Elaine Welch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Sigrid Gehrig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Kristin Haak
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.53
Ellen de Bliek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.50
Kim Wildstein
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Jennfier Toeppner
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Suzie Hill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Carly Sedney
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Laura Wysong
published
Cindy Maynard
published 3.5
3.15
Susana Albisu
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Heleen Honeyborne
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Karen Mays
published
Karlie Wetherington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nina Harteveld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vanessa Haak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Welch + Suzie Hill9263% games+16.0% vs expected
Lori Colapietro + Heidi Stucke16169% games+12.6% vs expected
Ellen de Bliek + Natalie King4163% games+9.1% vs expected
Lori Colapietro + Ellen de Bliek6161% games+4.2% vs expected
Kim Wildstein + Ellen de Bliek4452% games−2.1% vs expected
Kim Wildstein + Heidi Stucke3261% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Vallejo + Kristin Haak2351% gamesnot enough data
Kim Wildstein + Lori Colapietro314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie King
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Lori Colapietro
40W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Connie Land
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Heidi Stucke
42W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Julie Tindle
41W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
Vicky Vallejo
5W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Elaine Welch
24W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
Sigrid Gehrig
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
3.67
Kristin Haak
16W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Ellen de Bliek
28W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Kim Wildstein
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jennfier Toeppner
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Suzie Hill
29W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Carly Sedney
24W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Laura Wysong
7W–15L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Cindy Maynard
10W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susana Albisu
9W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.15
3.5
Heleen Honeyborne
35W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Mays
2W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karlie Wetherington
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nina Harteveld
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vanessa Haak
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.