Teams

Laredo Men's 3.0 Izaguirre

Adult 18 & Over League · 3.0 Men's

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-25vs Laredo Men's 3.0 MoraLost 12
L#1 DoublesTomas Izaguirre / ERMILO RICHER vs Hector Gonzalez / Oscar Marroquinc4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesFranco Villarreal vs Enrique Volkmer2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDiego Delacruz / SALVADOR CISNEROS vs Eduardo Canamar / Gabriel Fernandez3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-18vs Laredo Men's 3.0 MoraLost 13
W#1 DoublesDiego Delacruz / Roberto Garcia vs Rodolfo Garza / Alejandro Muzza7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesFranco Villarreal vs Jaime Campos4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTomas Izaguirre / SALVADOR CISNEROS vs Michel Kuri / Hector Gonzalez1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesKenneth Kent vs Eduardo Canamar1-6, 0-6
2026-05-28vs Laredo Men's 3.0 MoraSplit 22
W#1 DoublesTomas Izaguirre / Diego Delacruz vs Jaime Campos / Ivan Mora6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKenneth Kent vs Oscar Marroquinc0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRomel Cuevas / SALVADOR CISNEROS vs ENRIQUE HINOJOSA / Alejandro Muzza1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesFranco Villarreal vs Eduardo Canamar6-1, 6-2
2026-05-20vs Laredo Men's 3.0 MoraLost 04
L#1 SinglesTomas Izaguirre vs Alejandro Muzza0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKenneth Kent / Franco Villarreal vs Antuan Zamudio / Michel Kuri1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDiego Delacruz vs Rodolfo Garza3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRomel Cuevas / SALVADOR CISNEROS vs Gabriel Fernandez / Elias Saucedo1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men's
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laredo Men's 3.0 Mora401649109
2Laredo Men's 3.0 Izaguirre0441633217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Tomas Izaguirre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
ERMILO RICHER
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Diego Delacruz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.65
SALVADOR CISNEROS
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Franco Villarreal
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Kenneth Kent
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Franco Villarreal + SALVADOR CISNEROS213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tomas Izaguirre
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
ERMILO RICHER
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Diego Delacruz
4W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
2.88
SALVADOR CISNEROS
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
Franco Villarreal
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
2.61
Kenneth Kent
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
91%9%<1%
2.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.