Teams

ALACHUA - DB - VanRoy

2022 Alachua Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-07vs FK - ReynaWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Cortney Wright vs Cheryl Brent / Kimberly Buffington5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-05-01vs FK - ReynaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDebbie McMillan / Debbie Bowers vs Jennifer Boyd / Jennifer Hewitson2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Embree / Jami Nordenstam vs Diana Royo / Pauline Stropp1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-24vs FK - ReynaLost 01
L#2 DoublesNancy Embree / Anne Stricklin vs Leigh Chak / Amy Graham1-6, 4-6
2022-04-11vs FK - ReynaWon 10
W#2 DoublesEkanong van Roy / MEGAN MOLYNEUX vs Cheryl Brent / Pamela Copeland7-5, 4-1
2022-04-03vs FK - ReynaWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Schroeder / Ekanong van Roy vs Leigh Chak / Cheryl Brent1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Tracey Bryant vs Pauline Stropp / Christy Ulbricht6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Nancy Embree vs Lisa Steed / Amy Graham4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-27vs FK - ReynaWon 10
W#2 DoublesEkanong van Roy / Anne Stricklin vs Debbie Reyna / Kimberly Buffington6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Elizabeth Schroeder
published 4.5
Anne Stricklin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Ekanong van Roy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Jami Nordenstam
published 4.5
3.84
Tracey Bryant
published 4
Debbie Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.57
Nancy Embree
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Marie Vanasse
published
Olga Nin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Stricklin + Ekanong van Roy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Schroeder
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.26
4.5
Anne Stricklin
36W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Ekanong van Roy
92W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jami Nordenstam
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Tracey Bryant
48W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Debbie Bowers
25W–26L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Embree
63W–33L career · 7 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Marie Vanasse
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olga Nin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.