← Teams

VTC-Kowalewski (10.0)

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0 Mixed

5 players · average NTRP 4.9 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.70 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.10
Kayleigh Tanca
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5.5
—
Jennifer Larsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
—
Monika Dolega-kowalewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 5
4.31
Lisa Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
—
Brandt Wegner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Results4 ties
2019-11-23Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesBrandt Wegner / Monika Dolega-kowalewski vs Richard Sabo / Amy Juppenlatz Sweet6-1, 6-2
2019-11-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesBrandt Wegner / Monika Dolega-kowalewski vs Heidi Affentranger / Noah Newman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2019-10-26Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesGreg Boudreau / Lisa Grant vs Sean Eberle / Caitlin Eberle6-1, 6-1
2019-10-04Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesLisa Grant / Greg Boudreau vs Andrew Nakajima / Leslie Ballard6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5.5
Kayleigh Tanca
102W–34L career
15%85%0%
5.10
5
Jennifer Larsen
93W–53L career
not enough data
—
5
Monika Dolega-kowalewski
129W–47L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Lisa Grant
41W–32L career
0%93%7%
4.31
4.5
Brandt Wegner
99W–70L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.