Teams

Ma.Morriston18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-07vs Sc.Chalkley18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Morriston / Surin Patel vs Gregg Newton / Stephen Dahlem6-4, 6-4
2025-09-30vs Br.Buckingham18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarc Morriston / Surin Patel vs Kevin Buckingham / BILLY WILLIAMS2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-12vs Sp.Anderson18CWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarc Morriston / Matthew Martinez vs Jonathan Wolfe / Ryan Wilborne7-5, 7-6
2025-09-02vs Sc.Chalkley18CWon 21
L#1 DoublesBen Bergmann / Ralph Sun vs Michael Lalor / Matt Cantando4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Leonard / Adrian Williams vs Marcos Castro / John Esham7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVijayanand Periannan / Chidi Madu vs Patrick Mobley / Stephen Dahlem6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adrian Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Anthony Skubic
published 3
Ben Bergmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Elliott Blades
published
2.67
Christopher Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Andrew Sonnier
published 3
2.63
Marc Morriston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Vijayanand Periannan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Surin Patel
published
2.48
THOMAS SIBRIZZI
published
2.23
Chidi Madu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ralph Sun
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tyler Lambert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Morriston + THOMAS SIBRIZZI2347% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adrian Williams
2W–1L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Anthony Skubic
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ben Bergmann
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elliott Blades
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Christopher Leonard
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Andrew Sonnier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Marc Morriston
17W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Vijayanand Periannan
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Surin Patel
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%38%62%
2.54
THOMAS SIBRIZZI
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Chidi Madu
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Ralph Sun
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Lambert
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.