Teams

Double Trouble

Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women Saturday

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-29vs Pain in the GrassLost 23
L#1 DoublesJoyce Szayna / Marianne Paparone vs Joanna Fisch / Caryn KarmatzRudy6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Susan Hamrahi6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Powell / Laurie Memis vs Monica Rogozinski / Pamela Kane2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Cruz-Pineda vs Gail Goldman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnn Mitchell / Regan Shafer vs Chung Do / Melissa Mogul2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-06-22vs Force FieldsLost 23
L#1 DoublesAmanda Shulski / Rebekah Sheaffer vs Heidi Pernia / Anne Russell1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRegan Shafer vs Samantha Kanarek3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichelle Avery / Lesya Paisley vs Amy Christine / Wanda Pamphile6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEmily Cruz-Pineda vs Mariann Wilusz6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Powell / Elaine Yeh vs Cindy Chung / Julie McCusker3-6, 3-6
2024-06-16vs Penn FranklinsLost 05
L#1 DoublesMarianne Paparone / Lesya Paisley vs Sonya Lee / Jessica Delaney1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Sara Meloni3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Cruz-Pineda / Ann Mitchell vs Ivy Brown / Carla Peralta3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRegan Shafer vs Olivia Phan0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNaina Gimadeyeva / Amanda Shulski vs Alisa Shver / Lynn Selhat2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-06-15vs Pain in the GrassLost 14
L#1 DoublesLesya Paisley / Linda Escobedo Childs vs Monica Rogozinski / Pamela Kane7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Gail Goldman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Mitchell / Amanda Shulski vs Lauren Gladstone / Marcy Mitchell5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesEmily Cruz-Pineda vs Susan Hamrahi6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNaina Gimadeyeva / Janie Saile vs Patricia Szipszky / Caryn KarmatzRudy1-6, 1-6
2024-06-08vs Court QueensWon 41
W#1 DoublesElaine Yeh / Michelle Avery vs Yanhong Feng / Dina Fisher3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Emily Wichert6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarianne Paparone / Linda Escobedo Childs vs Betty Angelucci / Nicole Costelloe6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesEmily Cruz-Pineda vs Yingli Yuan6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRebekah Sheaffer / Naina Gimadeyeva vs Krista Crosten / Hualin Li1-6, 5-7
2024-05-04vs Court QueensWon 41
W#1 DoublesJoyce Szayna / Marianne Paparone vs Dalia Murillo / Hualin Li6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Mary Nguyen6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Powell / Michelle Avery vs Betty Angelucci / Jeanette Soriano1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNaina Gimadeyeva vs Emily Wichert1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Escobedo Childs / Laurie Memis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-27vs Pennsbury PeacocksLost 14
L#1 DoublesElaine Yeh / Regan Shafer vs Ann Tracey / Dawn Keaton5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Naoko Ikeda7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNaina Gimadeyeva / Sheena Pierre vs Wu Yang / Gena Maresca5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLaurie Memis vs Cindy Zhuo6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Shulski / Janie Saile vs Jeannine Wachinski / Barbara Mangas6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-13vs Bucks Lady JammersWon 41
W#1 DoublesMarianne Paparone / Joyce Szayna vs Mara Berzins / Cheryl Rickert6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHonora Hegarty vs Tina Permar4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRegan Shafer / Naina Gimadeyeva vs Angela Mc Clenton / Loren Herbert6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLinda Escobedo Childs vs Kisha Lowenthal6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Shulski / Janie Saile vs Beth Lapat / Rong Nie6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Mina Kuriashkin
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.03
Laurie Memis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
3.95
Linda Escobedo Childs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Emily Cruz-Pineda
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.79
Marianne Paparone
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Ann Mitchell
published 4
Elaine Yeh
published 4
3.74
Regan Shafer
usually #2 Doubles 20%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Honora Hegarty
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Amanda Shulski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Naina Gimadeyeva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Rebekah Sheaffer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.30
Sheena Pierre
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Michelle Avery
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Jacqueline Powell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Janie Saile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joyce Szayna
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lesya Paisley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marianne Paparone + Linda Escobedo Childs3259% games+1.8% vs expected
Marianne Paparone + Joyce Szayna9653% games+1.1% vs expected
Rebekah Sheaffer + Amanda Shulski1438% games−5.1% vs expected
Michelle Avery + Jacqueline Powell1541% games−11.3% vs expected
Michelle Avery + Lesya Paisley303 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Powell + Regan Shafer123 matchesnot enough data
Rebekah Sheaffer + Honora Hegarty033 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Shulski + Janie Saile033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mina Kuriashkin
107W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Laurie Memis
128W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
Linda Escobedo Childs
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Emily Cruz-Pineda
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Marianne Paparone
47W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Ann Mitchell
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Elaine Yeh
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Regan Shafer
130W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Honora Hegarty
22W–29L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Amanda Shulski
5W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
Naina Gimadeyeva
5W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
Rebekah Sheaffer
3W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.50
Sheena Pierre
3W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Michelle Avery
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Jacqueline Powell
18W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.15
Janie Saile
0W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joyce Szayna
46W–48L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lesya Paisley
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.