Teams

SD LLW 7.0 University City/ Toda

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer - SD · SD - 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Matt Pearl vs Aida Padilla / Sam POlk6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / David Jahng vs Luisa Garcia de la Cabada / Terry Parker6-1, 6-2
2022-08-06vs SD 7.0 Mountain View/ SafaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJunko Toda / Jeffrey Hsu vs Jeffrey Newton / Michelle Avila6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCandace Gyure / Alexis Akira Toda vs Jose Oropeza / Angie Colonna7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJunko Toda / Jeffrey Hsu vs Viviana Rozo / James Pele6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCandace Gyure / Alexis Akira Toda vs Elizabeth Ponce / Rafael Salinas6-1, 6-4
2022-07-16vs SD 7.0 Mountain View/ SafaWon 20
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Matt Pearl vs Lizette Ferrero / Jeffrey Newton6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJunko Toda / John Torres vs Liza Tacher / Jose Oropeza6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJunko Toda / John Torres vs Celia Hernandez / Scott Drew6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCandace Gyure / Alexis Akira Toda vs Deltrina Raymond / Nick Runde6-2, 7-5
2022-07-02vs SD 7.0 SDTRC/ ChannickWon 10
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / Matt Pearl vs Sandy Dielman / Jeffrey Russell7-5, 6-2
2022-06-25vs SD 7.0 Peninsula/ GamaraWon 10
W#1 DoublesHaruko Vajda / David Jahng vs Elizabeth McLean / Daniel Riding7-6, 6-2
W#1 DoublesJunko Toda / David Jahng vs Linda Olson / Jorge Padilla6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCandace Gyure / Alexis Akira Toda vs Margaret Ann Mansell / Larry McDowell6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Junko Toda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.00
Matt Pearl
published
3.71
HONG ZEMAN
published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Hsu
published
3.60
Julie Wunderly
published 4
3.50
Haruko Vajda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
John Torres
published
3.28
Analia Goode
published 3.5
3.18
Mie Bennett
published
3.01
Candace Gyure
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Junko Toda
246W–88L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
Matt Pearl
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.00
4
HONG ZEMAN
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Jeffrey Hsu
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Julie Wunderly
60W–58L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Haruko Vajda
165W–125L career · 4 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
John Torres
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Analia Goode
57W–51L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Mie Bennett
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Candace Gyure
128W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.