Teams

LRSI-Sica/Sheheen/Trump

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-11vs LSBE-Beardslee/WestportWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Allison Nelin vs Sunny Donoghue / Zahra Simonetti6-3, 6-2
2024-09-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Plaster / Allison Nelin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-13vs LJGE-Germinario/TrumpSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAllison Nelin / Renee Sica vs Lee Ann Ahern / Pamela Temple3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Miller / Erin Taaffe vs Meghan Connolly / Rebecca Shady3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-06vs LJRI- Ritter /LNRC 18+ 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLlnon North / Erin Taaffe vs Cindy Long / Stephanie Adili4-6, 3-6
2024-08-23vs LLTU-Turley/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Nelin / Kimberly Sheheen vs Monaliza Onia / Sayra Brynn2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-16vs LBBA-Barber/EdgemoorLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristin Brown / Allison Nelin vs Linda Fogel / Katherine Karnatz1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLlnon North / Alison Cooper vs Cyndi Johnson / Claudia Burdulis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Dawn Aldrich
published 3.5
3.22
Kimberly Sheheen
published
3.21
Allison Nelin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Kristin Brown
published
3.03
Llnon North
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Jennifer Plaster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Erin Finn
published
2.80
Lesley Crabb
published
2.72
Erin Taaffe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Ann Baker
published 3
Renee Sica
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Sheheen + Jennifer Plaster2343% games+3.9% vs expected
Jennifer Plaster + Allison Nelin5168% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Brown + Dawn Aldrich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Aldrich
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
Kimberly Sheheen
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Allison Nelin
84W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristin Brown
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Llnon North
72W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Jennifer Plaster
119W–119L career · 2 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Erin Finn
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
2.95
Lesley Crabb
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Erin Taaffe
69W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Ann Baker
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.58
Renee Sica
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.