Teams

Hains Point Killer Bees

2023 Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over Weekday · Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-04-10vs Havin FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdriene Jordan / Jeannie Mun vs Sheila Gear Israel / Christie Poimboeuf6-1, 6-2
2023-04-05vs Havin FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesEve Pandit / Alissa Forbes vs Laree Martin / Megan Monaco0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeidi Hill / Adriene Jordan vs Susan Cole / Nathalie Ryan4-6, 2-2
2023-04-03vs Havin FunLost 01
L#2 DoublesRose Kary / Meghan Metzbower vs Susan Cole / Nathalie Ryan3-6, 2-6
2023-03-29vs Havin FunSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAlissa Forbes / Jeannie Mun vs Laree Martin / Susan Cole3-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRose Kary / Meghan Metzbower vs Sheila Gear Israel / Kathy Potter6-0, 6-2
2023-03-28vs Havin FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesRose Kary / Adriene Jordan vs Megan Monaco / Christie Poimboeuf3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJane Wishneff / Meghan Metzbower vs Ruth Fisher / Laree Martin3-6, 6-7
2023-03-27vs Havin FunLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdriene Jordan / Jane Wishneff vs Megan Monaco / Nathalie Ryan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeannie Mun / Meghan Metzbower vs Sheila Gear Israel / Laree Martin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-22vs Havin FunSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdriene Jordan / Jane Wishneff vs Christie Poimboeuf / Megan Monaco2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlissa Forbes / Eve Pandit vs Ruth Fisher / Xuanxanh Laurie6-4, 6-0
2023-03-20vs Havin FunSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAdriene Jordan / Jane Wishneff vs Megan Monaco / Christie Poimboeuf2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMeghan Metzbower / Lynn Mattucci vs Xuanxanh Laurie / Sheila Gear Israel7-6, 3-3
2023-03-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeannie Mun / Alissa Forbes vs Christie Poimboeuf / Megan Monaco6-7, 3-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Eve Pandit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Alissa Forbes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Adriene Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.82
Meghan Metzbower
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.81
Jane Wishneff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alissa Forbes + Eve Pandit14556% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eve Pandit
136W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Alissa Forbes
92W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Adriene Jordan
19W–70L career · type S · 6 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Meghan Metzbower
26W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Jane Wishneff
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.