Teams

No Strings Attached

Adult 18 & Over Spring · 5.0 Men Central

11 players · average NTRP 4.83 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-01vs NJD/KanetkarLost 03
L#1 DoublesZachary Anderson / Lars Bohn vs Noah Lilienthal / Ashwin Kanetkar2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCasey Schnabel vs Jayat Kanetkar3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRajiv Ragu / Raymond Matthieu Postadan vs Viraj Degaonkar / Ravi Netravali2-6, 2-6
2026-07-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesZachary Anderson / Jorge Sunderland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-24vs SandmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesRajiv Ragu / Dennis Barlotta vs Don Kim / Spencer Clark2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLars Bohn vs Travis Sandman6-7, 1-6
2026-07-11vs NJD/KanetkarLost 02
L#1 DoublesRajiv Ragu / Jorge Sunderland vs Eshan Kanetkar / Sadhista Linga1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRaymond Matthieu Postadan vs Viraj Degaonkar1-6, 1-6
2026-06-13vs NJD/KanetkarLost 03
L#1 DoublesZachary Anderson / Dennis Barlotta vs Ashwin Kanetkar / Ravi Netravali2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRajiv Ragu vs Eshan Kanetkar0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCasey Schnabel / Lars Bohn vs Tim Stierle / Noah Lilienthal2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men Central have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Chang
published 5
4.49
Rajiv Ragu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.39
Casey Schnabel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.30
Lars Bohn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dennis Barlotta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Jorge Sunderland
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
4.14
Raymond Matthieu Postadan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.03
Zachary Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Ronald Fletcher
published
Scott Lowder
published
Timothy Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dennis Barlotta + Raymond Matthieu Postadan7258% gamesnot enough data
Lars Bohn + Raymond Matthieu Postadan134 matchesnot enough data
Ronald Fletcher + Raymond Matthieu Postadan123 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Chang + Daniel Chang303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Chang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rajiv Ragu
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
4.49
5
Casey Schnabel
79W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
4.39
Lars Bohn
133W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Dennis Barlotta
41W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Sunderland
1W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Raymond Matthieu Postadan
72W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
4.14
Zachary Anderson
39W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
4.03
Ronald Fletcher
11W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Lowder
22W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Chang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.